Thread: Super Bowl Location

just what the question says. . . .

I think it should be in warm weather locations. Keep things the way they are.

All respect Dog but:

Do you think the Super Bowl should be restricted to a warm climate location or domed stadium?

That's not a yes or no question

Originally Posted by MileHighWrath

All respect Dog but:


That's not a yes or no question

why not?


would it had been more clear if i'd asked "do you think the super bowl should be restricted to a warm climate or domed stadium, as opposed to having all 32 stadiums in play?" i figured people would know what i was getting at. . . .

I knew what you were getting at but the way it's worded you are asking would you rather have it in a warm weather climate OR a doomed stadium?

... sorry I'm just splitting hairs.

I don't really get the answers .....but i think it should go to the team with Best record.

I think it should be held outdoors in the North. Get them cheese and wine fans out of the Super Bowl.

Nah, the change in conditions can help underdogs.

It's fine the way it is. Why change it now.

Who want's to play a game in Chicago or Green Bay in January?

Allot of the Cold Weather cities cannot handle the SB.

Football is an outdoor sport no matter what climate preferably cold! I believe the SB should alternate each year from North to South. But nowadays it isn't about the football game but the revenue the game draws in by advertisers, cooperate heads, and celebs and the American society are such weinies they can't even handle rain much less than the cold. And I know cold because it's been as cold as -35 this week here in NODAK no including the -55 wind chill the other day.

No

Warm weather or a domed stadium - that is not how real football is played.

Real football is played in the elements.

Have a Super Bowl in Cleveland.

While it's generally accepted that football is a cold weather game, the reality is, there are places where that's just simply not true. People in HI, AZ, CA, TX, LA, AL, NM, MS, GA, FL could argue that football is a warm weather game because that's how it's played there.

By playing in a warm weather/domed stadium the attempt is made to keep 'the elements' out of the game and allow the two 'best' teams to play at their highest level for the most important game. Adding, wind, rain, cold, snow, etc could give one team an advantage over another due to that teams favorable running game or whatever. It seems contradictory that each game used to determine who plays in the SB is played where ever, under what ever circumstances and yet the final game is played under 'perfect' conditions. But, let's face it, the Superbowl is an event that transcends the sport and, like it or not, has to be treated differently because of it and all of the events that surround the actual game itself.

Originally Posted by MileHighWrath

I knew what you were getting at but the way it's worded you are asking would you rather have it in a warm weather climate OR a doomed stadium?

... sorry I'm just splitting hairs.

i'm obviously no norman einstein-- but i did stay at a holiday inn express last night. . . .