View Poll Results: This will be used ONLY as a gauge of where people think we stand - Choose all that apply

Voters
93. This poll is closed
  • I like/am comfortable with the level of sexually oriented comments currently being used

    59 63.44%
  • I do not like/am uncomfortable with the level of sexually oriented comments currently being used

    15 16.13%
  • Don't allow adding ** to part of a censored word, or !, @ characters to get around filter

    28 30.11%
  • Allow adding ** to part of a censored word, or !, @ characters to get around filter

    29 31.18%
  • The current list of censored words is good

    39 41.94%
  • More words should be censored

    5 5.38%
  • Fewer words should be censored

    31 33.33%
  • I am in favor of a separate PG-13/R forum (no nudity allowed)

    37 39.78%
  • I am not in favor of a separate PG-13/R forum (no nudity allowed)

    26 27.96%
  • I think the message board rules, and how they are being enforced/circumvented are fine as is

    45 48.39%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 49

Thread: Poll on current state of Message Board - Read message before voting

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    67,742

    Default Poll on current state of Message Board - Read message before voting

    This is a poll to guage people's feeling on the general state of the message board.

    No decisions will be made from this poll, but it will be used to guage what further discussions (split forums, rules changes {more or less restrictive}, etc.) is needed in Town Hall.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tnedator View Post
    This is a poll to guage people's feeling on the general state of the message board.

    No decisions will be made from this poll, but it will be used to guage what further discussions (split forums, rules changes {more or less restrictive}, etc.) is needed in Town Hall.

    Okay...where's the poll. Is this an Admin joke?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fulshear, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    Bob Howsam
    Posts
    38,282

    Default

    He's probably typing it up. The thread posts before the poll because he has to type up all the poll options.
    "Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold

  4. The Following User High Fived SR For This Post:


  5. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SeeingRed View Post
    He's probably typing it up. The thread posts before the poll because he has to type up all the poll options.
    I'll have to take the poll later then, as I'm off to work.
    Good to see you SR...coming home soon...make sure to make it known.
    We can't have SR running loose on our streets and not be forwarned.

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fulshear, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    Bob Howsam
    Posts
    38,282

    Default

    FYI, you can choose multiple options on the poll.
    "Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Elm, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    #58
    Posts
    26,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SeeingRed View Post
    FYI, you can choose multiple options on the poll.
    Teah...you may want to add that info at the top of the poll, tned

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Adopted Bronco:
    Pat Bowlen
    Posts
    97,305

    Default

    I'm fine with people expressing their sexuality. No where has it crossed the line that I can see. Certainly none of it has been a personal attack.

    Fewer words should be censored.

    I've made up my own opinion on the PG-13/R Forum, and I don't think it's a good idea. The board as a whole, imo, should be PG-13, because as far as I can tell, there's no one under 13 years old here.
    *The statements above are my opinions, unless they are links, because then they are links, which wouldn't make them my opinions, and I suppose stats aren't necessarily opinion, but they are certainly presented to support an opinion. Proceed accordingly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buff View Post
    What is this, amateur hour? It's TNF against the Jets and you didn't think you'd need extra booze?

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Elm, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    #58
    Posts
    26,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MissouriBronc View Post
    I'm fine with people expressing their sexuality. No where has it crossed the line that I can see. Certainly none of it has been a personal attack.

    Fewer words should be censored.

    I've made up my own opinion on the PG-13/R Forum, and I don't think it's a good idea. The board as a whole, imo, should be PG-13, because as far as I can tell, there's no one under 13 years old here.
    I'll agree with you MO in the sense that PG-13 is completely up for interpretation. A few hidden curse words is one thing...then you have the stuff that me, Beef, Frau, etc. have fun joking about. I think if you created our own little slum in this village, the Bible thumpers wouldn't have to cross the tracks on our side of town and could continue to live in 1950

  10. The Following User High Fived CoachChaz For This Post:


  11. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Four Corners
    Adopted Bronco:
    Derek Wolfe
    Posts
    12,263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CoachChaz View Post
    I'll agree with you MO in the sense that PG-13 is completely up for interpretation. A few hidden curse words is one thing...then you have the stuff that me, Beef, Frau, etc. have fun joking about. I think if you created our own little slum in this village, the Bible thumpers wouldn't have to cross the tracks on our side of town and could continue to live in 1950
    I agree. I obviously don't have a problem with any of it, but if you have threads about classic cars or tennis it probably shouldn't turn into a discussion about Coaches hoes or beef's sexual tendencies, etc. That way if someone isn't interested in that sort of back and forth banter they don't have to read through 30 posts to find the ones about cars.
    Just my honest opinion. Not that I'm not guilty of hijacking threads or anything.

  12. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Elm, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    #58
    Posts
    26,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDaddyBronco View Post
    I agree. I obviously don't have a problem with any of it, but if you have threads about classic cars or tennis it probably shouldn't turn into a discussion about Coaches hoes or beef's sexual tendencies, etc. That way if someone isn't interested in that sort of back and forth banter they don't have to read through 30 posts to find the ones about cars.
    Just my honest opinion. Not that I'm not guilty of hijacking threads or anything.
    I won't disagree with you at all. I am very guilty of throwing out an innuendo here and there. However...I don't think I "force" the people involved to continue the banter as long as it goes on.

  13. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Adopted Bronco:
    Taysom Hill
    Posts
    40,851

    Default

    More freedom=

    I'm ok with the current level of sexually oriented comments, I think fewer words should be censored, I'm in favor of a PG-13/R section, although I'd prefer that sort of thing allowed everywhere.

  14. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Elm, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    #58
    Posts
    26,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Buff_bronc_fan View Post
    More freedom=

    I'm ok with the current level of sexually oriented comments, I think fewer words should be censored, I'm in favor of a PG-13/R section, although I'd prefer that sort of thing allowed everywhere.
    Many of us would...but if getting one thread to be ourselves is where it starts...I'm happy with that for now.

    Ya know...the most interesting thing to me about all this is typically...women are more offended by this talk than anyone...and yet, the women here engage in this type of conversation and the men are the uptight ones.

  15. The Following User High Fived CoachChaz For This Post:


  16. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Four Corners
    Adopted Bronco:
    Derek Wolfe
    Posts
    12,263

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CoachChaz View Post
    Many of us would...but if getting one thread to be ourselves is where it starts...I'm happy with that for now.

    Ya know...the most interesting thing to me about all this is typically...women are more offended by this talk than anyone...and yet, the women here engage in this type of conversation and the men are the uptight ones.
    Yea that is a little strange. Maybe the women who come to a predominately male message board (about a sports team) are more likely to hang out with the guys and enjoy the banter that most male friends have. Maybe? I don't know.

  17. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Elm, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    #58
    Posts
    26,171

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BigDaddyBronco View Post
    Yea that is a little strange. Maybe the women who come to a predominately male message board (about a sports team) are more likely to hang out with the guys and enjoy the banter that most male friends have. Maybe? I don't know.
    I'm not going to try to analyze it...I'll just enjoy it.

  18. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Albany, New York
    Adopted Bronco:
    Charley Johnson
    Posts
    27,236

    Default

    I don't know. It seems to me that some threads need more freedom, others not so much. I can't freely express my feelings about Phillip Rivers or the Raiders without getting a bit, shall we say, blunt. Duck Before Entering ought to be almost a "free Fire" zone. Same w/ most threads like whats on your mind or I'm drunk and bored... P+R pretty much the same. The Serious Football side of the House should be pretty much clear of anything but serious football talk - once next Season actually starts I'm not going to want to wade through a load of unrelated stuff there.

    It ought to be pretty self evident what goes where I guess.
    Last edited by Dreadnought; 01-25-2008 at 11:18 AM.

  19. The Following User High Fived Dreadnought For This Post:


Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 06-26-2008, 07:41 PM
  2. Replies: 109
    Last Post: 02-08-2008, 10:13 PM
  3. ***A message to those who change their board name***
    By Reidman in forum What's on your Mind (Chit Chat)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-10-2007, 12:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group