You're assuming the mind of someone who might be a bigot is logical. You're assuming both implicit and explicit biases aren't potentially in play. I don't understand it; we can find lawsuits of employers who literally don't hire/promote people on the basis of race. That's not a controversial statement. Why would a football coach be above that? How many minorities did he alienate with his words? And how many did he potentially not hire/promote?
I'm not saying he did or didn't do it. What I'm saying is it's a fair question to ask given his track record of comments. On its face, it's a fair question.
For the record, I don't think he made any racially motivated hiring decisions. But I do think it's entirely possible he lost the respect of his locker room after all this stuff started coming out. Not saying I know that for a fact, but it's entirely possible that kind of friction could disrupt the team to the point where keeping him as coach would be bad from a strictly football perspective. And it's not exactly like he won a ton his first 3 years there anyway, so I can see that making this decision easier as well.
As often happens with players, you can be as big a distraction as you want as long as your value to the team outweighs it. Once that balance flips, you're gone.
How can you say I jumped to conclusions when I literally said I didn't want him fired for the slurs and don't think he should be banned from coaching?
If I tell you I'm asking the question then I'm asking the question. And if Gruden doesn't want that question asked the onus is on him to either be a better person or not send emails like that, like a big silly goof.
There have been plenty of fair points made. And not just 'on my side of things'.
If someone wanted to pull past comments I made and inspect them, how could I cry foul? Prosecutors -which is what I was, not sure if you were around for that- wield tremendous power and often have enormous discretion. Who you have in that role matters. You can justify doing so many things in that role that a person could very well be a bad person and be able to plausibly justify their decisions. I said some awful things as a young man. And some people might think the nexus between 33 year old King and late-teen-early-20's-king is close enough. I don't use the f slur anymore. I don't say 'retarded' anymore. I don't think edgy jokes about race and the like are usually funny, albeit I leave room for the artists/comedians to try their hand with them. But ten years ago wasn't that long ago, either. So yeah, I'd like to think that I've changed enough to be a better man. And Gruden can change.
But let's also be fair here, Gruden was a grown ass man making comments that he felt entirely safe with because he never thought they'd see the light of day. That was a side of Gruden, on the record, for seven years or so. I believe, as Abe pointed out, in grace. I'm a bisexual man; I don't hold his slurs against folks like me against him because in the past decade we've seen a radical transformation towards the LGBTQ community. And I've always remembered that when thinking about how people act. Because that's the best side of people. Granted, there are those in my community who don't forgive that. And I can't tell them they're wrong. My dad didn't hold those who bashed him for being Arabic to a grudge, but he didn't think people who were called racist slurs had to offer grace, either.
tl;dr - Gruden is not a victim, his views and jokes are blatantly wrong and offensive, regardless if someone wants to hand wave away racism, and the cheerleader shit is the most concerning, Slim is my homie.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)