Thread: Sam Howell

Rattler would be tits.

Still don’t know about Howell, compared to Mayfield.

Rattler is toast, IMO. King, after watching the Cincy kid for a few weeks, I'm really impressed. Overall though, so far, this seems to be a pretty weak QB class. One guy to keep an eye on though is Malik Willis.

Originally Posted by kenoy28

Rattler is toast, IMO. King, after watching the Cincy kid for a few weeks, I'm really impressed. Overall though, so far, this seems to be a pretty weak QB class. One guy to keep an eye on though is Malik Willis.

But he makes full field reads.

People are talking up Carson Strong, eek!

Cannon for an arm, allegedly, but he’s slow and immobile as **** and comes from the Air Raidiest of Air Raids.

Originally Posted by Jaded

People are talking up Carson Strong, eek!

Cannon for an arm, allegedly, but he’s slow and immobile as **** and comes from the Air Raidiest of Air Raids.

Strong? uggghhhhh

I'm in on the Willis bandwagon but we need a brand new staff and viable offensive coaches willing to be patient first, this staff deserves Teddy B and Teddy B alone lol..

Originally Posted by kenoy28

Rattler is toast, IMO. King, after watching the Cincy kid for a few weeks, I'm really impressed. Overall though, so far, this seems to be a pretty weak QB class. One guy to keep an eye on though is Malik Willis.

Corral and Willis are the top 2, the Cincy kid is making a strong push for QB 3 though. Rattler is def broken, I think this benching if it officially happens will be the end of his high draft status. It wouldn't surprise me to see a good team with a good staff develop him in the NFL after drafting him though and him having success. He does have tools to build on, he needs some big time work at the moment IMO though.

Originally Posted by Elevation inc

Corral and Willis are the top 2, the Cincy kid is making a strong push for QB 3 though. Rattler is def broken, I think this benching if it officially happens will be the end of his high draft status. It wouldn't surprise me to see a good team with a good staff develop him in the NFL after drafting him though and him having success. He does have tools to build on, he needs some big time work at the moment IMO though.

He could get benched and still be a 2nd round pick, he’s better off developing in the NFL (as ****** up as that sounds) than he is in the OU offense.

Lock, Marriotta and Ridder/Willis would be my ideal QB depth chart next season.

I would get Mariota or Tua and then draft Ridder.

Originally Posted by Jaded

Lock, Marriotta and Ridder/Willis would be my ideal QB depth chart next season.

As long as the depth chart is the reverse order of this, sign me up!

The only problem with Mariota is the Raiders are definitely going to start him at some point this season, and they'll end up keeping him and getting rid of Carr.

Originally Posted by Jaded

Lock, Marriotta and Ridder/Willis would be my ideal QB depth chart next season.

Possible really just going to depend on Paton.....I would be pretty happy if we brought in Ridder or Willis for sure.

Originally Posted by aberdien

The only problem with Mariota is the Raiders are definitely going to start him at some point this season, and they'll end up keeping him and getting rid of Carr.

What? Why on earth would the raiders do some silly shit like that?

Originally Posted by Jeudy10Hamler1

What? Why on earth would the raiders do some silly shit like that?

Well, they are the Raiders.

Originally Posted by Elevation inc

Strong? uggghhhhh

I'm in on the Willis bandwagon but we need a brand new staff and viable offensive coaches willing to be patient first, this staff deserves Teddy B and Teddy B alone lol..

No playoffs = no retention. Win or ****.

Originally Posted by Jaded

He could get benched and still be a 2nd round pick, he’s better off developing in the NFL (as ****** up as that sounds) than he is in the OU offense.

If he gets benched would he be better off dipping to another school and playing one last year in NCAA?

Originally Posted by chazoe60

Well, they are the Raiders.

Scholarly response.