Quote Originally Posted by King87 View Post
I didn't read all of those words.

My point is that whether it was in the 90's or in the majority of the 2000's, KC was a team who had 'runs' that consisted of being good, but not a SB championship caliber team. That was the bulk of your success.

If Denver has a mini playoff drought -they do- and then falls in line with that via Fangio, average Qb play, etc. then they'll basically have their floor of success matching the bulk of yours.

In other words, you don't have much room to talk .

Hope you have a nice weekend, ZV.
....except I am not trying to make a case that anything KC did is better or worse than Denver....that's something you implied or wanted to bring to this discussion. My point is, and continues to be, I want Denver to barely make the playoffs and lose...consistantly over a decade or longer. You can compare that to Chiefs eras, or you can assign it some number value and atribute (or not) whatever level of success or failure that you want....I'll agree with whatever number you want to put on it, and I'll agree that it's wildly successful, mildly successful, unsuccessful....whatever nomenclature you want...I'm all for it....I just want it to happen as I've laid it out.