Thread: 2022 QBs

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

All sorts of idiots out there. Someone probably saw one of starter's ages and said...Denver...Safety. no brainer. Literally

Oh we need a safety just not before QB, edge or OT.

Originally Posted by King87

Should have gone with the QB last season so you're not stuck trying to get a QB in a weaker class like this. Then again, it feels like Qb's are so random there's no much difference from some guys to others.

I am kind of tired of the weak class rhetoric....so many so called strong classes had shit QB's and vice versa. You draft until you find your guy period. I wouldn't call this class stellar but there are some guys who could absolutely be franchise guys if developed.

Get rookie QB, Make sure you have addressed your OL, make sure you have legit weapons and make sure you are fine with adjusting your so called system the first couple years while they learn. Keep said system for continuity. When this is done it usually works out if the kid has talent and some work ethic, when it is not like in Denver's case it pitters out miserably.

Originally Posted by Elevation inc

I am kind of tired of the weak class rhetoric....so many so called strong classes had shit QB's and vice versa. You draft until you find your guy period. I wouldn't call this class stellar but there are some guys who could absolutely be franchise guys if developed.

Get rookie QB, Make sure you have addressed your OL, make sure you have legit weapons and make sure you are fine with adjusting your so called system the first couple years while they learn. Keep said system for continuity. When this is done it usually works out if the kid has talent and some work ethic, when it is not like in Denver's case it pitters out miserably.

Hey man, there's some validity there. We've also seen strong classes yield low fruit. I just figure that this rhetoric as you rightfully call is it embraced almost categorically, and that I don't know enough about the QB class/drafts in general to buck against the grain. Why do you hate my humility? Why do you attack me? RAWR

Originally Posted by Elevation inc

Oh we need a safety just not before QB, edge or OT.

The Broncos have four S’s they like.

Originally Posted by Jaded

The Broncos have four S’s they like.

They had 4 split field safeties that the previous coaching staff liked.

Originally Posted by elsid13

They had 4 split field safeties that the previous coaching staff liked.

It's a fair point, but Paton knew this might be fangio's last year. I don't think George would have extended Simmons if he didn't like him also.

Originally Posted by dogfish

It's a fair point, but Paton knew this might be fangio's last year. I don't think George would have extended Simmons if he didn't like him also.

Simmons has enough flexibility to play in either Fangio 2 safety look or cover 3 that Quinn likes. I am fair more concerned with front 7, especially the off ball linebackers and edge players.

Originally Posted by elsid13

Simmons has enough flexibility to play in either Fangio 2 safety look or cover 3 that Quinn likes. I am fair more concerned with front 7, especially the off ball linebackers and edge players.

I for one think it's a great idea to completely overhaul one of the league's top scoring defenses. It's not like we need resources to fix the offense or anything!

Originally Posted by Jaded

The Broncos have four S’s they like.

and center and guard as well......I think they also like a TE

Originally Posted by dogfish

I for one think it's a great idea to completely overhaul one of the league's top scoring defenses. It's not like we need resources to fix the offense or anything!

Im picking up a tinge of sarcasm here.

I think the odds of us landing someone like Kirk Cousins or Jimmy G are pretty high at this stage... There are only so many names out three once you get past Rodgers and Wilson.

Originally Posted by Buff

I think the odds of us landing someone like Kirk Cousins or Jimmy G are pretty high at this stage... There are only so many names out three once you get past Rodgers and Wilson.

If this is the case then ******* go get Watson.

Originally Posted by underrated29

If this is the case then ******* go get Watson.

I still think you are getting your hopes up to much in regards to getting those big 3.

As soon as I post this I see someone already posted it above. Sorry for the re-run!

Originally Posted by Northman

I still think you are getting your hopes up to much in regards to getting those big 3.

Because IMO its absolutely foolish to not. I do not think George is a fool. But people will start talking themselves into this crap and its what we have had the last few years and this draft doesnt have a QB that is worth moving up for let alone taking in the first round imo. So we need to solve our biggest need and we need to go take care of it. Not try a bandaid with cousins