Thread: The Aaron Rodgers Watch

Originally Posted by King87

Real talk: I so badly want Denver to get you the tackle you want and for that tackle to pan out. Because it would make you so happy. And a happy Jaded only makes the world a better place. Imagine Myles Garret and Khalil Mack just getting stonewalled by a Denver LT. You might cry. And not even because you're being a pouty ho.

You're not a pouty ho, fwiw.

His 23 & Me ancestry kit came back 8% pouty ho. Just sayin.

Originally Posted by Jaded

I’d still be a salty redass.

But for a different reason!

It would force you to be happier!

Originally Posted by hawgdriver

his 23 & me ancestry kit came back 80% pouty ho. Just sayin.

fify

Originally Posted by King87

But for a different reason!

It would force you to be happier!

Barf

Originally Posted by King87

fify

You ain’t lyin.

Originally Posted by Jaded

Barf

See how much shorter and less angry that post was?

You're getting it!

We're rehabbing Jaded!

messageboard trending: #rehabbingJaded #outlook #powerofpositive #draftthattackle

Originally Posted by Tned

I went on the second day of the draft and somehow didn't even notice, which is amazing with different color schemes and all. RW is one of my favorite sites, hope it doesn't go downhill.

Me too.

Did we just become best friends?

Originally Posted by King87

See how much shorter and less angry that post was?

You're getting it!

We're rehabbing Jaded!

messageboard trending: #rehabbingJaded #outlook #powerofpositive #draftthattackle

Ahh, hashtagging. Good for the soul.

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

I'd rather give up 3 #1s than our top 3 picks in the next 2 drafts. You can make up firsts via free agency, but losing 6 solid pick opportunities would bury a team IMO.

Maybe I should type s-l-o-w-e-r. The offer was for four picks, not six. They debated a first, second and third for 2021 before the draft began, plus a 1st in 2022. Obviously, that opportunity has already come and gone. My point was they could still offer Green Bay the same four picks but a year later - a first, second and third in 2022 plus a first-rounder in 2023. Now, the one quoting the conversation never mentions that it's the Packers. For all I know it was for Watson or Dak.

I still think the Patriots are going to get Watson for a seventh, the NFL will then clear him of any punishment other than a fine and Belichick will get six more Super Bowl rings but that's just my paranoia talking.

Originally Posted by NightTrainLayne

I thought this was a sneakers post when I first saw it.

Originally Posted by Buff

I thought this was a sneakers post when I first saw it.

Did you listen to Russillo today? Had Daniel Jeremiah on who said there's literally a zero percent chance he gets traded and the Packers will just let him retire if he doesn't want to play there. Talk about putting a damper on my day!

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Did you listen to Russillo today? Had Daniel Jeremiah on who said there's literally a zero percent chance he gets traded and the Packers will just let him retire if he doesn't want to play there. Talk about putting a damper on my day!

I am only about halfway through DJ. That's my take as well. I was excited for about 20 minutes on draft night and now I'm back to thinking it's an impossibility.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Did you listen to Russillo today? Had Daniel Jeremiah on who said there's literally a zero percent chance he gets traded and the Packers will just let him retire if he doesn't want to play there. Talk about putting a damper on my day!

DJ had ONE GM tell him that he would stand pat and call Rodgers bluff and force him to retire...and so he's running with that theory. I guess it's an option to prove a point, but if every scenario ends with Rodgers not playing for your team...and one of them gets you a haul of draft picks and players...how to you justify not exploring the trade aspect.