Thread: The Aaron Rodgers Watch

Originally Posted by Jeudy10Hamler13

Chubb is not von Miller, also gone game has a lot more than just SPEED to it. You also need more than just one great pass rusher now day’s.

Chubb is a worthy number one pass rusher. You also missed the part where I said you'd be replacing Chubb as the second pass rusher. That would mean I wasn't advocating for the team having just one pass rusher.

Originally Posted by CoachChaz

Personally, I want to know that if I give up three #1's for him...that he'll be here for three years. I would have been more apt to do this deal before this draft than I would after. When you have a guy like Rodgers to go with the young talent we have, attracting top FA's can offset the draft picks. But once he's gone...we're definitely going to need them.

And if this happens...for the love of God...please tell Paton to talk with Aaron BEFORE he drafts the QBOTF.

I don't see Aaron walking away from being the best in the world at something. Especially if he could be the first QB to lead a three-peat. Dude wants his GOAT.

He will go all-in and walk from the table if GB doesn't blink. But if he's ballin and winnin'...giving up 3 #32 picks is nothin.

Originally Posted by Hawgdriver

I don't see Aaron walking away from being the best in the world at something. Especially if he could be the first QB to lead a three-peat. Dude wants his GOAT.

He will go all-in and walk from the table if GB doesn't blink. But if he's ballin and winnin'...giving up 3 #32 picks is nothin.

But the reality is...he's 37 and about to be newly married. Any significant injury or life change could alter his priorities at this stage.

Originally Posted by King87

It is a different scenario with PM. He was a FA. But, SB windows are short. It's very possible by the time Denver finds the QBotF the young talent now is all about to get paid. I also think it's fair to say wasting time on scrubs like TS, CK, JF etc...that was mortgaging the future because you never had a chance to win in the short term with them, and they could never build to the future.

But who ******* knows? Maybe Lock turns into the QB Gawd. Or Teddy B goes higgity ham.

This team definitely has a lot of talent - on paper - and is young. Unfortunately (Lock included) none of them showed it off last year.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

This team definitely has a lot of talent - on paper - and is young. Unfortunately (Lock included) none of them showed it off last year.

Thats because they were all on IR last year

Originally Posted by underrated29

Thats because they were all on IR last year

Not the receivers dropping balls...

Or Gordan fumbling...

I thoroughly enjoy watching fans of a team with Teddy ******* Bridgewater at QB pontificating about whether or not they want Aaron Rodgers. You can’t make this shit up.

Originally Posted by CoachChaz

Personally, I want to know that if I give up three #1's for him...that he'll be here for three years. I would have been more apt to do this deal before this draft than I would after. When you have a guy like Rodgers to go with the young talent we have, attracting top FA's can offset the draft picks. But once he's gone...we're definitely going to need them.

And if this happens...for the love of God...please tell Paton to talk with Aaron BEFORE he drafts the QBOTF.

The 9ers set the market, it is what it is, no guarantees . If you don’t start with Three 1’s you’ll end up with Teddy Bridgewater.

Originally Posted by 7DnBrnc53

Sloter wasn't given a chance because of Elway's ego. He wanted his guy (Crapston Lynch) to be the man. In fact, Kyle hasn't been given a chance anywhere.

And, if Paton actually believes that (about Lock), he better update his resume.

If anything you can blame Kubiak and his hardon for Trevor Siemian or JFE’s hardon for Brent because that’s what cost you your boy Sloter. Lynch was never in any danger that early in his career and he had far more potential than Sloter.

And don’t get it twisted, I liked Sloter before you even knew his name.

Originally Posted by Jaded

I thoroughly enjoy watching fans of a team with Teddy ******* Bridgewater at QB pontificating about whether or not they want Aaron Rodgers. You can’t make this shit up.

Expect that's not what's happening at all. Everyone wants him, the discussion is what we should give up for him, which is fair for a 37 year old who has already dipped his toe in the water of his TV career. But I guess in Jaded terms that means "Screw Rodgers, for gimme some scrub!".

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Expect that's not what's happening at all. Everyone wants him, the discussion is what we should give up for him, which is fair for a 37 year old who has already dipped his toe in the water of his TV career. But I guess in Jaded terms that means "Screw Rodgers, for gimme some scrub!".

I know exactly what you’re discussing; whether or not you wanna pay the market price.

Don’t sass me!

If you ever thought “nah, that’s too much for Aaron Rodgers” you should be trolled ... without any sass!

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Expect that's not what's happening at all. Everyone wants him, the discussion is what we should give up for him, which is fair for a 37 year old who has already dipped his toe in the water of his TV career. But I guess in Jaded terms that means "Screw Rodgers, for gimme some scrub!".

Btw ... *Except

Originally Posted by Jaded

If you ever thought “nah, that’s too much for Aaron Rodgers” you should be trolled ... without any sass!

So if the Packers said "we want every pick in the next 10 drafts as well as Von, Chubb, Simmons, Surtain, Sutton, Bolles, Jeudy, and Fant" your answer is "where do I sign?". Obviously that a preposterous example, but it goes to show that there is a line where the price is too high. So I reject your trolling!

Originally Posted by Jaded

Btw ... *Except

No it's ecksept.