Thread: Bridgewater For A 6th!

not a bad deal at all. I always liked Teddy

Originally Posted by kenoy28

Here is my biggest fear right now:
1. Jag- Lawrence QB
2. Jets- Wilson QB
3. 49ers- Jones QB
4. Falcons- Fields QB (this is still entirely possible)
5. Bengels- Chase WR
6. Fins- Smith WR
7. Lions- Lance QB
8. Panthers- Pitts TE

QB's are off the board. I don't want to take a right tackle at pick 9--there are plenty of good RT guys later in the draft. If this happens, I imagine it's Parsons, or trade back. But we won't get a big haul if all 5 QB's are taken

i would love it if the board fell like that. . .

Originally Posted by dogfish

i would love it if the board fell like that. . .

Are you still taking Parsons there or would you go with Sewell?

Originally Posted by Buff

Are you still taking Parsons there or would you go with Sewell?

for me, it's sewell all day. . . you should be able to get either nick bolton or jabril cox in the second. . .

Originally Posted by dogfish

for me, it's sewell all day. . . you should be able to get either nick bolton or jabril cox in the second. . .

This all day! If you can take the premier Tackle in the draft, he always trumps the best ILB, IMO. Not to mention, I think Sewell could be an all-pro at RT. At LT he projects to be a 15 year solid starter, but with his power and size, he should be a monster at RT. Or like Jaded said, groom him to take over for Bolles once the guaranteed $ in Bolles’ contract expires. Either way, having 2 badass tackles for the next several years sounds amazing.

Originally Posted by CoachChaz

I'm always baffled at how many QB's throw short on 3rd down. That being said, Bridgewater STILL outperformed Lock last year...on a worse team...with arguably less talent. I think he brings enough experience and success to let Lock know that he needs to show something...FAST.

Not really, His WR core was better then ours, he had McCaffery for a few games, then he also had Davis who was serviceable. The OL's played pretty much the same, we had bolles playing well, but the rest of our OL struggled all year. We had Gordon who wasn't serviceable until his last 8 games and a very underperforming Lindsay, and a pretty mediocre performing WR core overall with below avg production from the TE position. Lets not also forget that Lock threw More TD's Then Teddy In less games played with a substandard supporting cast.

I think Paton killed it on this deal, but Lock was the better QB on the field when they went head to head, it was clear as day. What this move does is protect against Lock's injury history and provides us a competent game manager at an excellent cost, in the event Lock doesn't improve or get it. If that does happen you cut bait with both at the end of the year and get a new QB and new staff to grow together. This was genius maneuvering and I'm very happy about it. I really do believe we are going to stay put at 9 at take a CB, ILB or T or trade back.

I really am impressed by Paton and his patience and transparency this off-season.

As for pick 9 I think it has to be Sewell or Horn, and you find a way to get Jamin, or Jabril at LB

Sewell is certainly possible but I think he goes to Carolina unless Fields makes it past Atlanta. If that happens we should just take Horn, and go get our ILB as mentioned above.

Originally Posted by Elevation inc

As for pick 9 I think it has to be Sewell or Horn, and you find a way to get Jamin, or Jabril at LB

Sewell is certainly possible but I think he goes to Carolina unless Fields makes it past Atlanta. If that happens we should just take Horn, and go get our ILB as mentioned above.

If we go Horn, we'd have to trade back in to the late teens/early 20's to get Davis. Or hope Cox doesn't go early 2nd. I'm completely excited about a Horn/Cox draft, but it could be a lot to hope for.

Sandy just checked in with the most blistering hot take of the season. He says that Teddy will be the starter, that Denver should release lock, and that they should trade back for a linebacker even if fields is there at 9. Lol.

We do need linebacker but im curious who Sandy thinks should sit behind Bridgewater if we release Lock. I mean, even if you go into the season with Teddy starting you have to have some kind of younger QB to groom in the process.

Originally Posted by dogfish

Sandy just checked in with the most blistering hot take of the season. He says that Teddy will be the starter, that Denver should release lock, and that they should trade back for a linebacker even if fields is there at 9. Lol.

Lol. I'm probably the biggest Lock detractor here and that's an absurd take from him. If you think Lock is bad enough to cut him, you absolutely have to draft a QB. Hanging your hopes on Teddy is the dumbest of the 3 options.

Drew Lock is already better than Bridgewater, I don’t care what your stats say.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

As sad as I am that we won't get a Jaded meltdown over Minshew, I'll settle for a JeudyHamler meltdown if we draft a QB and trade Lock.

Fine ... hold my beer.

I’m not sure why anyone is excited about a quarterback competition. We won’t compete with Kansas City or San Diego, and probably not Las Vegas either, with what we have at quarterback.

Midget! Stop playing the show, or let me spank your ass, and give a draft grade. Media influenced and whatnot......