Thread: Off Season Moves

Originally Posted by Shazam!

Saw an article from SI with GB trading Love to Den. idk if there is any truth to that, but this would please me greatly. I find SI to be a joke.

I have to assume the cost would be too high on that since he was just a 1st round pick last year. That said, most of the "hypothetical" rumors I've seen about Love involve the Patriots. But who knows?

Originally Posted by Shazam!

Saw an article from SI with GB trading Love to Den. idk if there is any truth to that, but this would please me greatly. I find SI to be a joke.

Would be difficult to translate the value. The only precedent that comes to mind would be Brett Favre? He got taken in the 2nd, then traded for a mid first the next year. Broncos would have to give up pick number 9 to get Love, which honestly for the Packers might not be a bad deal.

I think it's much more likely that Bridgewater comes here with no pay cut, and the Panthers send us a pick in the 4th or 5th to pick up the salary similar to the Oz trade.

Originally Posted by CoachChaz

Ok...I'll play along. Which QB...either FA or possible trade or even draftable...is going to come in and immediately offer that "baseline competency" to push Lock? If not veterans that have had at least some level of success already, then who? It's not going to come from Jones, Lance or Fields right away...so who?

The whole argument about having a Bridgewater or Minshew is about having something that is at the very least competent and capable whether Lock fails or if he does well and simply gets injured...again.

I’m not the one saying they need to bring someone in, I’m literally saying the opposite (unless that player has talent). But ... Lance and Fields are better prospects, they have baseline NFL talent dripping out of their pores. Believe what you want but that’s reality.

I understand your argument for Bridgewater and Garbage, what I’m trying to get you to understand is the reality that if Lock fails the last ****** thing the Broncos need is Bridgewater and Garbage ... if they turn out to be what you say they offer they literally serve zero purpose.

You’re making the argument that one of them can come in a “win” a few games, I get that, the reality is THAT is the last thing the Broncos need if Lock fails.

The Broncos “won” 5 games and because of that they have a slim chance of landing the QB they need ... like Lance or Fields. You may think Bridgewater or Garbage can be the answer or that “you play to win the game” (barf!) but the odds are so infinitesimal that it renders this debate nothing more than unnecessary brain damage.

The smart move is landing Lance or Fields, or ride and die with Lock, you don’t have to like that but it’s reality.

I’m not buying the argument that Bridgewater or Garbage is a smarter move than Fields or Lance, that’s obscured. And If the 9ers are stupid enough to trade three 1’s for the right to replace Garopolo with Mac ******* Jones then I say the NFL community probably isn’t buying that argument either.

Chances are overwhelming that Bridgewater and Garbage are not the answer, so they are as pointless as a screen door on a submarine.

Also, if Lock “needs to be pushed” then just draft his replacement now and get it over with.

Love story is driving by gambling site and no inside information.

Originally Posted by Jaded

I’m not the one saying they need to bring someone in, I’m literally saying the opposite (unless that player has talent). But ... Lance and Fields are better prospects, they have baseline NFL talent dripping out of their pores. Believe what you want but that’s reality.

I understand your argument for Bridgewater and Garbage, what I’m trying to get you to understand is the reality that if Lock fails the last ****** thing the Broncos need is Bridgewater and Garbage ... if they turn out to be what you say they offer they literally serve zero purpose.

You’re making the argument that one of them can come in a “win” a few games, I get that, the reality is THAT is the last thing the Broncos need if Lock fails.

The Broncos “won” 5 games and because of that they have a slim chance of landing the QB they need ... like Lance or Fields. You may think Bridgewater or Garbage can be the answer or that “you play to win the game” (barf!) but the odds are so infinitesimal that it renders this debate nothing more than unnecessary brain damage.

The smart move is landing Lance or Fields, or ride and die with Lock, you don’t have to like that but it’s reality.

I’m not buying the argument that Bridgewater or Garbage is a smarter move than Fields or Lance, that’s obscured. And If the 9ers are stupid enough to trade three 1’s for the right to replace Garopolo with Mac ******* Jones then I say the NFL community probably isn’t buying that argument either.

Chances are overwhelming that Bridgewater and Garbage are not the answer, so they are as pointless as a screen door on a submarine.

I want someone who "can win a few games" if Lock is doing well and gets hurt for a game or 2. I understand the "suck for luck " philosophy, but there are other things to consider when looking for depth.

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

I want someone who "can win a few games" if Lock is doing well and gets hurt for a game or 2. I understand the "suck for luck " philosophy, but there are other things to consider when looking for depth.

That’s different and I agree but Lock isn’t there yet.

This is where I point out that Case Rypien is 1-0 in this scenario, and you don’t have to give up a draft pick for him (or any other QB like him).

Originally Posted by Jaded

That’s different and I agree but Lock isn’t there yet.

This is where I point out that Case Rypien is 1-0 in this scenario, and you don’t have to give up a draft pick for him (or any other QB like him).

Against the worst team in football...and still tossed 3 ints.

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

Against the worst team in football...and still tossed 3 ints.

And 2 more were dropped (well, Jeudy stole one from the DB and another was dropped).

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

Against the worst team in football...and still tossed 3 ints.

Yeah when you put it like that it sounds bad.

It was actually the 2nd worst team and it Should have been 5 Int’s, just sayin he won.

Originally Posted by Jaded

Yeah when you put it like that it sounds bad.

It was actually the 2nd worst team and it Should have been 5 Int’s, just sayin he won.

Just saying Tebow won!

Originally Posted by HORSEPOWER 56

And 2 more were dropped (well, Jeudy stole one from the DB and another was dropped).

Jets were so bad they couldn't even win the Lawrence sweepstakes. That's next level ish.

There’s only about 5” of facial hair and 3” of denim Jorts separating Rypien from Garbage.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Just saying Tebow won!

Tebow hates ‘Merica!

Originally Posted by Jaded

There’s only about 5” of facial hair and 3” of denim Jorts separating Rypien from Garbage.

5” of mullet, my man. And it’s glorious to behold!