Thread: Drew Lock

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis

I am no where near as down on Lock or Bridgewater as Buff - but no where near as high as the Judy poster

What I did think was crazy - out of that list of post manning QBs - I liked Trevor the best, which really shows how poor we have been at the position - other notables we brought in - Oz, Sanchez and that dude who wore 7 for the vikings for a few years

When Watson comes in, he is going to light it up and the massage parlours of Colorado will at least know what to expect when he calls!

I took bak my hi five once I got to the “Trevor” quote.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Wait, you're saying if Lock had just played better he'd have better stats? What a revelation!

No … yes … yes and no.

Originally Posted by Tbolt

He won't prove to be a good starter and I am not sure the risk averse Fangio will take him anyway. This is the same guy that signed off on Flacco.

Teddy B. practices well. He is personable. He is talented. He just goes into a shell when the lights get bright, but all his good qualities are why I expect they will be itching to start him over Lock.

Both are BAD OPTIONS for this team. Lock needed to show more last year and has an extremely short leash, assuming he is even considered 1A. at this point.

This is pretty spot on, with some objections Lock predictions and to the expectation of Lock last year, Dude has legitimate reasons behind this.

You can make the case for either.

I think the bigger issue is Paton being a coward and not drafting Fields. The logic there was if things go sideways this year maybe a new head coach doesn't want to 'inherit' a starting QB.

I saw fooey to that. Rookie QB's have had all kinds of success in the past, and teams with a loaded roster -such as yours- make great use out of exploiting those rookie deals. Moreover, he fell to you.

Originally Posted by King87

You can make the case for either.

I think the bigger issue is Paton being a coward and not drafting Fields. The logic there was if things go sideways this year maybe a new head coach doesn't want to 'inherit' a starting QB.

I saw fooey to that. Rookie QB's have had all kinds of success in the past, and teams with a loaded roster -such as ours- make great use out of exploiting those rookie deals. Moreover, he fell to us.

Fixed that tomfoolery!

Originally Posted by underrated29

Fixed that tomfoolery!

This is not the place for your foolishness!

Originally Posted by King87

This is not the place for your foolishness!

Who is the more foolish; the fool or the fool that follows the fool?

Originally Posted by King87

You can make the case for either.

I think the bigger issue is Paton being a coward and not drafting Fields. The logic there was if things go sideways this year maybe a new head coach doesn't want to 'inherit' a starting QB.

I saw fooey to that. Rookie QB's have had all kinds of success in the past, and teams with a loaded roster -such as yours- make great use out of exploiting those rookie deals. Moreover, he fell to you.

I have feeling that Paton's QB was Lance, if he had fell. Supposed he blew teams away with his zoom interviews and understanding of the offenses. Field supposed didn't interview as well

Originally Posted by King87

This is not the place for your foolishness!

If not here, where?

Originally Posted by elsid13

I have feeling that Paton's QB was Lance, if he had fell. Supposed he blew teams away with his zoom interviews and understanding of the offenses. Field supposed didn't interview as well

So Paton passed on an elite QB prospect because he didn’t “blow teams away” in zooms?

I’m having a hard time understanding how this exonerates passing on an elite prospect at what was really their only position of need.

Dude thinks he solved the QB issue with Bridgewater, which is a fireable offense and an affront to everything that could be considered reasonable logic.

Originally Posted by Jaded

So Paton passed on an elite QB prospect because he didn’t “blow teams away” in zooms?

I’m having a hard time understanding how this exonerates passing on an elite prospect at what was really their only position of need.

Dude thinks he solved the QB issue with Bridgewater, which is a fireable offense and an affront to everything that could be considered reasonable logic.

Don't worry. Lock will save the day!

We dodged a bullet by not taking Fields.

Originally Posted by Northman

We dodged a bullet by not taking Fields.

I get that same feeling, but what the F do I know?

Dodge one bullet, get hit by another!

Originally Posted by Jaded

So Paton passed on an elite QB prospect because he didn’t “blow teams away” in zooms?

I’m having a hard time understanding how this exonerates passing on an elite prospect at what was really their only position of need.

Dude thinks he solved the QB issue with Bridgewater, which is a fireable offense and an affront to everything that could be considered reasonable logic.

It was interview, no matter if was on zoom or not. Bad interviews mean you aren't hired.