Thread: Drew Lock

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

Being stupid?

What did I say that was stupid? Literally all I said was that it's not completely unfathomable that the pack could move on from Rodgers if they really like this guy they just picked. I didn't say it's likely or that it's likely we'd get Rodgers if he were shopped. Just that I thought it was stilly to say Rodgers would be as impossible to acquire at this point as Mahomes or Wilson.

I'm fully aware they let Rodgers sit for a few years, but that was also 15 years at this point, when they had a different coach and GM. So we really don't know how the current staff will handle it.

So no, I'm not going to apologize for my completely reasonable take.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

What did I say that was stupid? Literally all I said was that it's not completely unfathomable that the pack could move on from Rodgers if they really like this guy they just picked. I didn't say it's likely or that it's likely we'd get Rodgers if he were shopped. Just that I thought it was stilly to say Rodgers would be as impossible to acquire at this point as Mahomes or Wilson.

I'm fully aware they let Rodgers sit for a few years, but that was also 15 years at this point, when they had a different coach and GM. So we really don't know how the current staff will handle it.

So no, I'm not going to apologize for my completely reasonable take.

Good grief. Did you not notice the emoji?

Relax dude.

Brock was supposed to be Denver's Aaron Rodgers.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

I do think UR kinda has a point here. Not necessarily that Rodgers will be on the market this offseason, but it's a little silly to say that the odds of getting him are the same as getting Wilson or Mahomes. Even if he's likely going to stay in GB, his age and who they just drafted at least crack open that window morseo than any younger star you could name.

Yep. That post was not that I think it could or would happen. He is the most likely of all of the SB contending QBs to become available though.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

WTF is Love? Never heard of him.

Hes a nobody imo. I think he getting drafted caught the whole world off guard in the first rd. He might be a more polished Brett Hunley or whatever his name is that they took in the 2nd or 3rd rd or whatever a few years back. Which made the pick all the more confusing.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

Good grief. Did you not notice the emoji?

Relax dude.

I am quite relaxed!

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

If Rodgers has five years left, as you say, why would the Packers trade him? He’s the known quantity. They’ll trade Love before they trade Rodgers, like Garapollo and New England. Love is the chip, not Rodgers. You’re right, they could part ways in, checks notes, 2024.

His contract. hes older and will start the decline. IDK.

Why the hell did they draft Love in the first?
Why have they ignored Aarons plea for a WR or two?

You say Garappalo I say Jarrett Stidham.
If you dont like that one then I say Rivers and Brees.
If you dont like that one then I say siemian and Lynch.

I have a billion more on my side then you do.


So, back to my initial point. Of all of the Qbs that could be available (cant believe I have to spell this out to minute details for everyone), possibly, in the very unlikely world of any of them becoming available, at all, Rodgers is the one most likely. He is also the only one I would consider. Again, in such a long set of circumstances, however, circumstances that odds favor rodgers more than any other SB type QB in the league. The entire league. Of all the teams. He.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

I am quite relaxed!

I am NOT!
I demand someone answer for this injustice and take you to the Kraft especial and get you a nice relaxing sensual massage. Buff can escort you only because I wonder if he would cry after?

Originally Posted by underrated29

Hes a nobody imo. I think he getting drafted caught the whole world off guard in the first rd. He might be a more polished Brett Hunley or whatever his name is that they took in the 2nd or 3rd rd or whatever a few years back. Which made the pick all the more confusing.

The only real surprise was that it was the Packers, who have regularly failed to address other positions on offense around Rodgers. Love had been on the radar for a few years. All the measurables, Josh Allen type of prospect.

Originally Posted by underrated29

His contract. hes older and will start the decline. IDK.

Why the hell did they draft Love in the first?
Why have they ignored Aarons plea for a WR or two?

You say Garappalo I say Jarrett Stidham.
If you dont like that one then I say Rivers and Brees.
If you dont like that one then I say siemian and Lynch.

I have a billion more on my side then you do.


So, back to my initial point. Of all of the Qbs that could be available (cant believe I have to spell this out to minute details for everyone), possibly, in the very unlikely world of any of them becoming available, at all, Rodgers is the one most likely. He is also the only one I would consider. Again, in such a long set of circumstances, however, circumstances that odds favor rodgers more than any other SB type QB in the league. The entire league. Of all the teams. He.

Why did Green Bay draft Aaron Rodgers in the first place, why did Dan Reeves draft Tommy Maddox in the first, why did Belichick draft Garapollo in the second? I don’t think drafting a quarterback signals you’re definitely done with your current one, but I grant you that my sarcastic reply was less plausible than your original unlikely post.

hate to be the bearer of bad news, but matt ryan is vastly more likely than aaron rodgers, if john were to go to the aging vet QB well again. . .


barring something unforeseen, they need to just stick it out with drew. . . dude still hasn't even had a full, regular off-season. . .

Originally Posted by dogfish

hate to be the bearer of bad news, but matt ryan is vastly more likely than aaron rodgers, if john were to go to the aging vet QB well again. . .

You shut your whore mouth!

Originally Posted by underrated29

You shut your whore mouth!

don't shoot the messenger. . .

Trade for Matt Stafford sounds great

Originally Posted by dogfish

hate to be the bearer of bad news, but matt ryan is vastly more likely than aaron rodgers, if john were to go to the aging vet QB well again. . .


barring something unforeseen, they need to just stick it out with drew. . . dude still hasn't even had a full, regular off-season. . .

That last fact gives me little solace when the same is true for Burrow and Herbert, both of whom look well on their way to being elite.

Originally Posted by Shazam!

Put your glasses on and re-read what I said, would he get benched if he didn't perform better. Did you even watch the game last week?

Put on your glasses and read my posts about watching last weeks game.