Originally Posted by
Poet
No consistent proof?
the problem is that you take the burner WR and you say "You must be a ******* God at NFL," and won't except anything less than that but don't hold that standard.
The LT you guys want? Guess what - odds say he's average. You know what else the numbers say? That overall Bolles is an average LT.
It doesn't have to be Ruggs - but I sure do want a talented WR in the first over this remix's LT.
Not taking a WR in round one to get someone else and then double dipping at the posiion in other rounds isn't necessarily effective or efficient, either.
Remember two drafts ago when it was a heavy Te draft? We kept saying "oh we can get another one later," and wound up with a shitty bum TE with medical issues. Yeah, the depth at the position is there - which would tell you that the guys atop that deep class are one (especially impressive) worth taking and (two) there's going to be a big run on them.