Right now we are all Rams fans. Go Rams.
Yes, how dare LA take their team back that St Louis stole from them. If anything Kroenke is a hero for bringing the Rams back home.
Man, when Falco decides to obsess about something, he foes full on heroin addict. Yay, tell us more about how much you hate the Rams owner. Make sure to talk about it in every thread regardless of subject. Woopty doo, most teams screw over their city with tax breaks and stadium financing. Stop watching the NFL if it bothers you so much.
Dear Shane,
I'm sorry Stan the Man stole your girl. You could have let it go but you had to see for yourself and her cries of ecstasy wounded you deeply. She never made those sounds for you. Maybe a look in the mirror and an honest moment of self-assessment that Stan is giving her the kind of D she's always wanted and you could never give will help you get past this state of feeling sorry for yourself.
Love,
Hawg
Ps it does suck dude but you gotta move on, you aren't doing yourself any favor savoring this grudge...
Originally Posted by Sting
Brady is there for you Shane!!!!!!!!!!!!
You know it's bad when SF goes to a site known as being a SJW site.
The article speaks to things like corporate welfare, for instance. Oh, SJWSF, I mean SF, I'm sorry. I didn't recognize you.
Cities like STL, and the counties they are in, have their own attorneys. When you enter into a contract, especially on that level, you're going to have issues with it. Now, any good one year law student will tell you that in a contractual situation, you can always breach it and suffer the ramifications. Didn't that article note something like $100,000,000 discrepancies? And, since you're a STL boy, you have known for years, just like I have, that the city was going to have issues with that deal.
The article glosses over the time the franchise was in L.A., and glosses over the fact that the Rams had success there, but didn't get great support unless they were winning.
Now you want to talk about how tax breaks and what not are stupid to give NFL teams and franchises? Absolutely, because there's a strong argument for that. But, one, you don't get to make that argument because you're Mr. Capitalist, until you're not (lol) and two, that criticism doesn't just fall on L.A.
At least he finally sacked Arsene Wenger.
https://ftw.usatoday.com/2017/07/nfl...e-sports-teams
This is why it’s hard to blame owner Stan Kroenke for wanting to move the team to Los Angeles. Even with the team struggling to fill its stadium on Sundays and Rams games getting better TV ratings in St. Louis than in Los Angeles, the team is worth so much more thanks to a more high-profile location and a new stadium on the way. St. Louis just would not have provided the opportunity for that kind of growth.
Now only five NFL teams are worth more than the Rams: The Cowboys ($4.2 billion), Patriots ($3.4 billion), Giants ($3.1 billion), 49ers ($3 billion) and Redskins ($2.95 billion).
https://www.businessinsider.com/la-rams-value-2016-1
When the owner of the Saints wanted to move the team people screamed and shouted it down. It didn't happen. It would have been wrong. This, however, was right.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)