It took Lock awhile to become a 60% passer, but he had a really nice year.
I would welcome the pick.
I'd accept it. I'd have to. I just would be irked if we did this not because of getting a great talent/willingness to trade up for one next year, but because we really do still like CK.
I doubt a Keenum commitment is present, though.
If we drafted a flat out top elite stud, that'd be awesome. But if we flub the pick I'd be sad as ****.
This is true - but he still might be the QB next year.
IDK, Nomad. At this point I've screamed my lungs out about Keenum, QBs, etc.
Maybe we should build the most talented defense that we can, target guards, and run the ball 40 times a game. Try to go Baltimore Raven on that ass!
I don’t think anyone can say that in this day and age. Seriously. Outside of pass rushers and CBs, there are almost no defensive positions worth a 1st round pick anymore. Everything favors the offense. You must have a QB in this day and age. List the MLBs from the 4 Championship teams without looking... you can’t. Even if you could if any of them missed the game would it matter that much? Everyone here can definitely name the QBs and envies those teams for having them.
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip.” -Winston Churchill
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)