Thread: Who will be the Broncos QB in 2019?

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

Can my answer be...I don't care. Gimme Fromm in 2020?

Fromm could tear an acl in 2019, or have a bad season... too early to lock in on 2020 QBs. While the prospects look more promising in 2020, a lot can happen between now and then.

Originally Posted by King87

I hate this mentality, lol. Kicking the QB can down the road. A Hero isn't just a sandwich.

A hero is also probably not in this group of QBs.

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

A hero is also probably not in this group of QBs.

That point I will agree on. We're going to have to find a diamond in the rough in this draft class. Elway's history of this is 0 fer, odds are not in our favor in 2019

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

A hero is also probably not in this group of QBs.

Haskins is legitimate as ****.

It's weird - people want us to never address the position meaningfully because it will fail. I guess it's because if we just BPA it we can hover around .500 and pretend we are relevant. It's safe.

Originally Posted by Freyaka

That point I will agree on. We're going to have to find a diamond in the rough in this draft class. Elway's history of this is 0 fer, odds are not in our favor in 2019

If he can't find the QB he shouldn't be the GM.

Two straight drafts there's no QB worth either drafting or trading up for? That's simply untrue.

Originally Posted by King87

Haskins is legitimate as ****.

It's weird - people want us to never address the position meaningfully because it will fail. I guess it's because if we just BPA it we can hover around .500 and pretend we are relevant. It's safe.

I was actually joking. I like Haskins. That's about it though for this group. If we take another at 10, I'll deal...just not very confident in the group.

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

I was actually joking. I like Haskins. That's about it though for this group. If we take another at 10, I'll deal...just not very confident in the group.

A lot of teams don't need a QB. This is the time to trade up.

I'm hurting for Haskins, SA!

Originally Posted by King87

Haskins is legitimate as ****.

It's weird - people want us to never address the position meaningfully because it will fail. I guess it's because if we just BPA it we can hover around .500 and pretend we are relevant. It's safe.

Few will argue with you, but the cost to jump from 10 to 1 overall is far too high and someone will take that dude #1 overall.

Elway is married to Keenum for another season; but maybe they can find a worthwhile backup with a later pick. The trouble is, what is the biggest need; Offensive line, Defensive front or secondary? I am betting Elway picks a pass-rusher.

Originally Posted by Freyaka

Few will argue with you, but the cost to jump from 10 to 1 overall is far too high and someone will take that dude #1 overall.

The Jimmy Johnson draft chart has kinda gone out the window lately. It'll cost, but not like it used to.

Originally Posted by King87

A lot of teams don't need a QB. This is the time to trade up.

I'm hurting for Haskins, SA!

Giants will definitely be taking a QB and most likely will take Haskins so we can dodge that bullet.

Originally Posted by I Like TDs

Elway is married to Keenum for another season; but maybe they can find a worthwhile backup with a later pick. The trouble is, what is the biggest need; Offensive line, Defensive front or secondary? I am betting Elway picks a pass-rusher.

Some mocks have us going DL with our 1st.

Originally Posted by Northman

Some mocks have us going DL with our 1st.

I saw one having ua grad a WR.

Originally Posted by Northman

Some mocks have us going DL with our 1st.

Which is stupid... Corner, o-line, QB, MLB....All of those are FAR more pressing needs that d-line. Our d-line needs address, but it's not a pressing need.

Originally Posted by Northman

Giants will definitely be taking a QB and most likely will take Haskins so we can dodge that bullet.

I love him.

Shhh.