Thread: So, it will be between Saquon Barkley and Philip Lindsay

Not knowing names, which would you rather have?

171 attempts, 829 yards, 4.8 yds/carry
135 attempts, 780 yards, 5.8 yds/carry

Originally Posted by Broncoknight30

Would you just....shut up....for a week about Keenum?

Thanks

Uh no, you dont like it put me on ignore. Quit being a little bitch.

Thanks

Originally Posted by Freyaka

Barkley has a lot of receiving yards though. The total yards is where the gap widens.

The Broncos don't use him in that manner. Apples to oranges.

Originally Posted by Broncoknight30

Would you just....shut up....for a week about Keenum?

Thanks

It's a message board, no one needs to shut up at all. How about ignoring it if you don't want to talk about it.

Originally Posted by GEM

Not knowing names, which would you rather have?

171 attempts, 829 yards, 4.8 yds/carry
135 attempts, 780 yards, 5.8 yds/carry

Can you add passing stats in there too, porfavor?

Originally Posted by underrated29

Can you add passing stats in there too, porfavor?

As I already covered, the Broncos don't use him in that manner, but here you go.

171 att, 829 yards, 4.8 yds/carry, 87 targets, 71 catches, 581 yards, 8.2 avg
135 att, 780 yards, 5.8 yds/carry, 31 targets, 21 catches, 187 yards, 7.8 avg

Originally Posted by GEM

Not knowing names, which would you rather have?

171 attempts, 829 yards, 4.8 yds/carry
135 attempts, 780 yards, 5.8 yds/carry

I don't need to know names to know the bottom one is Lindsay. I agree, but you are leaving out some important stats.

8 Rushing TD 581 receiving yards 8.2 yds/catch 4 receiving TD
6 Rushing TD 187 receiving yards 7.8 yds/catch 1 receiving TD

It's a close race to be sure, but you can't leave off Barkley's impact in the passing game, if you do, it skews things towards Lindsay.

*edit* I see you added them later.

Originally Posted by GEM

As I already covered, the Broncos don't use him in that manner, but here you go.

171 att, 829 yards, 4.8 yds/carry, 87 targets, 71 catches, 581 yards, 8.2 avg
135 att, 780 yards, 5.8 yds/carry, 31 targets, 21 catches, 187 yards, 7.8 avg

Thanks.
I would go with 1. It is close. It does not matter how much one team uses a player vs another. Barkley is the better RB. I would not however trade Philip for Barkley at the cost of 1st rd pick and salary, our boy wins. Plus, I love his attitude!!!!! He always pops up and runs his mouth! Dude is a gamer. Straight ballin all the time.

Originally Posted by Broncoknight30

And I will make a frucking message too for that matter you piece of shit.

Go fruck yourselves.

Bye dude, I await your name in the ban/suspension list update. This is basically the most idiotic post I've ever seen on this message board... like who talks to a mod like that

Originally Posted by Freyaka

I don't need to know names to know the bottom one is Lindsay. I agree, but you are leaving out some important stats.

8 Rushing TD 581 receiving yards 8.2 yds/catch 4 receiving TD
6 Rushing TD 187 receiving yards 7.8 yds/catch 1 receiving TD

It's a close race to be sure, but you can't leave off Barkley's impact in the passing game, if you do, it skews things towards Lindsay.

The thing that skews things to Lindsay is he was undrafted and wasn't expected to even make a team. :shrugs: Way lower cost for pretty similar stats.

Originally Posted by underrated29

Thanks.
I would go with 1. It is close. It does not matter how much one team uses a player vs another. Barkley is the better RB. I would not however trade Philip for Barkley at the cost of 1st rd pick and salary, our boy wins. Plus, I love his attitude!!!!! He always pops up and runs his mouth! Dude is a gamer. Straight ballin all the time.

I'll take Chubb and Lindsay for the win.

Originally Posted by GEM

As I already covered, the Broncos don't use him in that manner, but here you go.

171 att, 829 yards, 4.8 yds/carry, 87 targets, 71 catches, 581 yards, 8.2 avg
135 att, 780 yards, 5.8 yds/carry, 31 targets, 21 catches, 187 yards, 7.8 avg

I mean, it doesn't matter if he's used that way. It's still a contributing factor to the team. One adds that contribution and that has to be considered when determining which one had the better season.

Originally Posted by GEM

I'll take Chubb and Lindsay for the win.

I hope it comes down to Lindsay, but it's a popularity contest and it doesn't always roll that way when one is a Giant and one is a Bronco sadly.

Originally Posted by Freyaka

I mean, it doesn't matter if he's used that way. It's still a contributing factor to the team. One adds that contribution and that has to be considered when determining which one had the better season.

Do you mean that, Frey?

Originally Posted by Freyaka

I hope it comes down to Lindsay, but it's a popularity contest and it doesn't always roll that way when one is a Giant and one is a Bronco sadly.

You are correct. As much as we want it to be him. He has little chance. I think saquon or as Timmy! said, Baker. But man that would be cool. Still, it is not going to happen. Too much bias. Too much against us and him. And As you said, the whole market thing too.

Originally Posted by underrated29

Do you mean that, Frey?



You are correct. As much as we want it to be him. He has little chance. I think saquon or as Timmy! said, Baker. But man that would be cool. Still, it is not going to happen. Too much bias. Too much against us and him. And As you said, the whole market thing too.

He can't even get rookie of the week. Not surprising. Bunch of schmucks.