Thread: Musgrave not only has a new QB, he has devised a whole new offensive system

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

Why would Musgrave design an offense for someone on a different team? Lynch’s playbook struggles are fairly well know.

Okay, Lynch's struggles with the playbook are well known. My struggles with electronics are
well known among those acquainted with me. In view of my degrees in psychology, I'm not
usually accused of stupidity. As respective individuals, we have different talents and aptitudes.
So, again, struggling with a certain genre does not connote the lack of intelligence.

Originally Posted by topscribe

Okay, Lynch's struggles with the playbook are well known. My struggles with electronics are
well known among those acquainted with me. In view of my degrees in psychology, I'm not
usually accused of stupidity. As respective individuals, we have different talents and aptitudes.
So, again, struggling with a certain genre does not connote lack of intelligence.

Ok cool. I don’t care about Lynch’s acumen in psychology, though.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

Ok cool. I don’t care about Lynch’s acumen in psychology, though.

Oh? So Lynch studied psychology?

Originally Posted by topscribe

If you are going to ignore, I suggest you do just that. It seems somewhat inconsistent that
you will have someone on ignore then take such interest in that person's comment that has
been exposed to you. If you can't stand my argument, then go your arrogant way. I don't
need your thinly veiled denigration. You need help, son.

Have you ever thought that maybe, possibly, you are the problem? Just throwing that out there as food for thought.

Originally Posted by Freyaka

Have you ever thought that maybe, possibly, you are the problem? Just throwing that out there as food for thought.

Your hypocrisy is amazing. You have a very thin skin when it comes to what someone says
to or about you, but when I react to a passive-aggressive attack on me, I am the problem.

Have you ever given thought to keeping me on ignore? Just food for thought.

Originally Posted by topscribe

Oh? So Lynch studied psychology? Your ability to carry an objective conversation underwhelms me.

Your ability to make relevant arguments underwhelms me.

Lynch's studies, or his acumen in (insert non-football subject) has no bearing on his knowledge of an NFL playbook. Therefore, I don't care about it.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

Your ability to make relevant arguments underwhelms me.

Lynch's studies, or his acumen in (insert non-football subject) has no bearing on his knowledge of an NFL playbook. Therefore, I don't care about it.

Speaking of irrelevant arguments, I seldom see anything from you that seems anything besides
irrelevant one-liners.

You seem to have this propensity to carry on arguments about trivial issues. I simply proffered
my opinion that I don't believe lack of intelligence to be part of the acumen of the players in
question. I have my opinion, and you have yours. I expressed mine, and you expressed yours.
Issue over. Let's move on . . .

Originally Posted by topscribe

Speaking of irrelevant arguments, I seldom see anything from you that seems anything besides
irrelevant one-liners.

You seem to have this propensity to carry on arguments about trivial issues. I simply proffered
my opinion that I don't believe lack of intelligence to be part of the acumen of the players in
question. I have my opinion, and you have yours. I expressed mine, and you expressed yours.
Issue over. Let's move on . . .

You decided to make this personal. Not me. And, frankly, you can **** off. I have relevant, civil discussion on here almost every day. It's not really my problem if you can't read. I was only commenting on whether or not I thought dumbing down the offense was in response to the current quarterbacks on the team, because that certainly is on the table here, given Lynch's struggles with the playbook in the past. I find it unlikely, because Case Keenum doesn't seem like a low-football-IQ type of player, but you apparently read right past that.

You came in with Trevor Siemian, who isn't even on the damn team so has no bearing on designing the offense, and something about Paxton Lynch might be smart in another subject. When Paxton is on the bill of a local coffeehouse on Slam Poetry Night, we'll make sure you know. I'm here to watch football.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

You decided to make this personal. Not me. And, frankly, you can **** off. I have relevant, civil discussion on here almost every day. It's not really my problem if you can't read. I was only commenting on whether or not I thought dumbing down the offense was in response to the current quarterbacks on the team, because that certainly is on the table here, given Lynch's struggles with the playbook in the past. I find it unlikely, because Case Keenum doesn't seem like a low-football-IQ type of player, but you apparently read right past that.

You came in with Trevor Siemian, who isn't even on the damn team so has no bearing on designing the offense, and something about Paxton Lynch might be smart in another subject. When Paxton is on the bill of a local coffeehouse on Slam Poetry Night, we'll make sure you know. I'm here to watch football.

Let me start over again:

No. There is nothing dumb about TS (Northwestern) or PL (Memphis).

I wouldn't have an issue with "raw" or "inexperienced."

The issue involves the time when TS was on the team, and the implication was that
intelligence was an issue at that time.

I then simply said your analysis wasn't deep enough. Perhaps the term "lazy" set you off.
That wasn't intended as a personal remark. I was alluding to your analysis. It is a term
often used in writing. If that offended you, I didn't mean it to.

This is what started this firestorm. Strange.


P.S. I have been guilty of lazy analysis. So, again, it wasn't an allusion to your character
at all. It is actually "shorthand" for other factors not taken into consideration. I guess I
shouldn't use the term on this board since it is jargon understandably not understood
here.

And . . .

Originally Posted by topscribe

Oh? So Lynch studied psychology? Your ability to carry an objective conversation underwhelms me.

You are right about my getting personal. That was unnecessary. I apologize.
.

Case Keenum isn't football stupid.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

To be fair, I have no idea of Keenum’s IQ. Lynch seems like an idiot. My feelings on Kelly are fairly well known.

Seems??? How about is.

Lynch isn't an idiot, we are talking about a kid that had no playbook in HS, had 20 plays in college and now we are asking to run a NFL playbook with complex verbiage . Add in the fact that we have changed systems all three years he been he has been here and there is no wonder he is struggling.

Originally Posted by elsid13

Lynch isn't an idiot, we are talking about a kid that had no playbook in HS, had 20 plays in college and now we are asking to run a NFL playbook with complex verbiage . Add in the fact that we have changed systems all three years he been he has been here and there is no wonder he is struggling.

And...you have proof of this.

Originally Posted by Canmore

And...you have proof of this.

It was reported in DP and other media.

Originally Posted by elsid13

It was reported in DP and other media.

OK. Since I don't read the DP, what did they say?