Thread: Broncos reportedly could be top landing spot for Tyrod Taylor

Originally Posted by chazoe60

Pete Carroll did too coach the Patriots. Do you enjoy being wrong?

1997-1999

Originally Posted by Cugel

What the hell?

Pete Carroll went from USC to the Seahawks. He never coached for the Patriots!

And Coughlin went from the Jaguars to the Giants, without a stint in NE either!

Belichick himself did better in NE than the Jets, but that could just be because the Jest, Jest, Jest, suck, suck, suck!

Name all these former Patriots assistant coaches who have had great careers as head coaches in the NFL. I'll wait.

In addition to what has already been pointed out about Carroll indeed coaching New England, Belichick didn't coach a single game for the Jets, FYI.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

In addition to what has already been pointed out about Carroll indeed coaching New England, Belichick didn't coach a single game for the Jets, FYI.

Not as the head coach no, but he was D coordinator

Lmao, and then people wonder why they dont take Cugel seriously on football takes. I mean **** dude, simply google it if you dont ******* know. haha

Originally Posted by tripp

I'll admit I have no knowledge of football X's and O's or anything on QB play. I use my eyes and what I see on the field each week, I watched every Bills game last year, and I, without a shadow of a doubt, do NOT want this guy on my team. He's a poor mans Mike Vick, inaccurate, can't read defenses, and has a hard time finding open receivers. He uses his legs to bail him out most of the time, scrambles till he eventually gets a receiver open, and then he misses them by 5 yards.

If he's a Bronco next year we're not winning more than 6 games, and those 6 wins aren't because of Taylor, they're because of our defense.

You know man the stats don't really support your take. Not to be argumentative but if the guy doesn't turn the ball over a lot it means he's probably not making a ton of bad weeds. In the NFL if you make a lot of bad reads it equates to turnovers. And Taylor just does not turn the ball over. Also if you're trying to tell me that the bills have better receivers in the Broncos and a better defense that I don't know if I buy that one either. Although the defense fell off last year in Woods first season. I would accept Simmons and parks to continue to develop Demarcus Walker look like a player at the end of the season hopefully wolf is healthy so 6 games does not make sense to me.

Originally Posted by dogfish

Originally Posted by Von Kinger

If Chad Kelly was legitimate, wouldn't a team have drafted him much earlier?

or, you know. . . have drafted him at all, for that matter? the kelly stuff cracks me up. . . 31 teams didn't think he was worth drafting at all. . . but since he did such a great job of being on IR, now he's in serious consideration for our starting job. . . get real, people. . . kelly is practice squad fodder, or our 3rd string, long term developmental project, at best. . .

dog typically I agree with you on most things Bronco. But I think that there is a lot there to legitimately say Kelly could be the QB of the future. Has football Acumen is a lot higher than either lunch or Simeon. He ran a pro-style offense in college. He has all of the physical tools. He beat all the big-name teams in the SEC. The big question mark for him going Beyond injury is his volatility. I think that the Kaepernick situation in the NFL has made teams a little bit more leery of perceived head cases

Originally Posted by Jsteve01

dog typically I agree with you on most things Bronco. But I think that there is a lot there to legitimately say Kelly could be the QB of the future. Has football Acumen is a lot higher than either lunch or Simeon. He ran a pro-style offense in college. He has all of the physical tools. He beat all the big-name teams in the SEC. The big question mark for him going Beyond injury is his volatility. I think that the Kaepernick situation in the NFL has made teams a little bit more leery of perceived head cases

To be honest, I’d love to see what Kelly has. Unfortunately, I think the only way Kelly gets an opportunity is if he ends up the same as Siemian. We’d have to get rid of Lynch (maybe) and Siemian (likely), draft a QB to be our future who isn’t quite “ready” the first year, and sign a veteran QB to be the placeholder who ends up not doing well in camp.

In other words, he’d pretty much have to do the Trevor Siemian thing all over again and beat out whatever vet we brought in while we develop his replacement. Just like Siemian and Lynch. The league isn’t “fair” and nobody is going to give a 7th round pick the start unless he wins out decisively over a proven vet and whomever we draft.

why?