Thread: Practice / press conference notes - week 16 (Redskins week)

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

The whole season has been puke. Do you want to go into next season with the Lynch question still hanging in the air? I don’t. He needs as many No. 1 reps and minutes in real games as he can get now.

No, the question is already answered.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

They gave Siemian 25 games. They can give Lynch 6.

They don't need 6. He ******* sucks and there is not a snowballs chance in hell that he earns shit. He couldn't beat out Trevor ******* Siemian. Bite the bullet and cut the kid. Sorry, not sorry.

Originally Posted by GEM

They don't need 6. He ******* sucks and there is not a snowballs chance in hell that he earns shit. He couldn't beat out Trevor ******* Siemian. Bite the bullet and cut the kid. Sorry, not sorry.

Siemian, for as bad as he became, won more games than Paxton can count to.

Don't give me this need to see what the kid has while Henderson is buried on the ******* roster because he fumbled in preseason.

Originally Posted by GEM

No, the question is already answered.

It probably is. But to not just see out the season with him is just dumb. I don’t give a **** if Osweiler has a good game here or there. The season has been done and over with for two months. **** meaningless wins. Play the young guys, regardless of whether you think they’re good or not.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

It probably is. But to not just see out the season with him is just dumb. I don’t give a **** if Osweiler has a good game here or there. The season has been done and over with for two months. **** meaningless wins. Play the young guys, regardless of whether you think they’re good or not.

Except they aren't playing the young guys. If Henderson don't suit up and play but Lynch does....this whole thing is just absolute bullshit.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

It probably is. But to not just see out the season with him is just dumb. I don’t give a **** if Osweiler has a good game here or there. The season has been done and over with for two months. **** meaningless wins. Play the young guys, regardless of whether you think they’re good or not.

Yep, and then become the Browns. No win is meaningless in the eyes of potential FA's.

Originally Posted by GEM

They don't need 6. He ******* sucks and there is not a snowballs chance in hell that he earns shit. He couldn't beat out Trevor ******* Siemian. Bite the bullet and cut the kid. Sorry, not sorry.

lol! next time, stop sugar-coating it and tell us how you really feel!

Originally Posted by dogfish

lol! next time, stop sugar-coating it and tell us how you really feel!

The ******* idiot mechanic in our building is trying to poison us with carbon monoxide this afternoon....apparently that puts me in a shitty mood, along with BAH ******* HUMBUG!

Originally Posted by GEM

The ******* idiot mechanic in our building is trying to poison us with carbon monoxide this afternoon....apparently that puts me in a shitty mood, along with BAH ******* HUMBUG!

Its not that hard to duct the exhaust outside. Tell him not to be a lazy tonto.

Originally Posted by GEM

Except they aren't playing the young guys. If Henderson don't suit up and play but Lynch does....this whole thing is just absolute bullshit.

Don’t disagree. But I also think not playing Henderson is not really a reason Lynch shouldn’t as well.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

Yep, and then become the Browns. No win is meaningless in the eyes of potential FA's.

We’re not the Browns. We’re not in danger of becoming the Browns and that wouldn’t make us the Browns. 18 years of losing makes you the Browns, not 10 games (provided that’s what the loss column says at the end of the year).

Originally Posted by Al Wilson 4 Mayor

Its not that hard to duct the exhaust outside. Tell him not to be a lazy tonto.

Exactly!

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

Don’t disagree. But I also think not playing Henderson is not really a reason Lynch shouldn’t as well.



We’re not the Browns. We’re not in danger of becoming the Browns and that wouldn’t make us the Browns. 18 years of losing makes you the Browns, not 10 games (provided that’s what the loss column says at the end of the year).

Point taken, however if players feel like the organization gave up, what's the incentive to come here? Oz played very well last week. Starting Paxton says "we don't care about winning" in my opinion.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

Point taken, however if players feel like the organization gave up, what's the incentive to come here? Oz played very well last week. Starting Paxton says "we don't care about winning" in my opinion.

Fair enough. I don’t think one season, or 9-10 games would do that.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

Fair enough. I don’t think one season, or 9-10 games would do that.

I don't really think so either, but if we're going to court a guy like Cousins or the like, it could give them pause. Kicking and screaming, and all...