The Plan at the moment:
Draft: Trade a 3rd and 6th this year to a team to move up and get a 2nd next year (this will happen).
Players I want:
Jake Ferguson (Jake Butt) or Jelani Woods or Jeremy Ruckert or Cade Otten (owen daniels) at TE- All 4th rd or later.
Troy Anderson LB 3rd/4th rd (yay Timmy!)
Neil Farrell, JR DL- run stuffer- bye purcell
The Plan at the moment:
Draft: Trade a 3rd and 6th this year to a team to move up and get a 2nd next year (this will happen).
Players I want:
Jake Ferguson (Jake Butt) or Jelani Woods or Jeremy Ruckert or Cade Otten (owen daniels) at TE- All 4th rd or later.
Troy Anderson LB 3rd/4th rd (yay Timmy!)
Neil Farrell, JR DL- run stuffer- bye purcell
Wait, so UR can snap chat, but he can’t put photos on a message board?
If I was the Browns new GM I would not use the #1 overall pick on a Qb bring him in and have him beaten flat and ruined like every other one of their QBs because I have no talent around him. They've had tons of draft picks and they can't win a game. I'd stick with DeShone Kizer and try and develop him. Instead they are drafting another QB.
That is what losing teams do isn't it? Use a first round pick on a Qb every year?
What he means is "that is what you do if you are the Browns."Hue Jackson continues to stand behind the potential of DeShone Kizer, but the Cleveland Browns coach admitted the team’s quarterback situation could get awkward in 2018.
That’s because the Browns are certain to have one of the top two or three picks in the draft -- probably the first selection -- and likely would wind up with another highly drafted quarterback on the roster.
“It could be awkward,” Jackson told the media on Monday, after the Browns fell to 0-12 and 1-27 since he became the head coach. “That’s not a good problem because it means you’re losing. But I think it’s a problem that in this situation you want to have.
“I think we can’t have too many good quarterbacks right now on this football team.”
Hue Jackson continues to stand behind his belief that DeShone Kizer can be a winning quarterback in the NFL. Jake Roth-USA TODAY Sports
The Browns could bring back Kizer, draft a quarterback and even sign a free-agent QB, if they chose; they have enough salary-cap room to do so. Adding depth at the position, he said, is simply logical.
"That's just what you do," Jackson said.
What they should do? Trade back, draft the best defensive player in the draft, and then take a QB later in the first round, and continue to develop Kizer. Is that ideal? No, but if you gave them a healthy Andrew Luck that would only delay their development. They need impact players and lots of them.
They missed the boat on a couple of quality QB picks recently, and traded away from drafting Wentz.
I don't think there is anyway they pass on that again. Who knows if any of the top guys this year is Wentz, but they won't take the chance on passing on the guy again.
He will get a "multi-year deal" but not more than a 1 year guaranteed contract. As for this season, if the Broncos look better in the last 3 games then he probably will get a look. The Browns would not be defeated every game if they had him. They'd still suck but not as bad.
Hue Jackson says you're right. But, if they had Wentz he would not be the QB who is currently leading the Eagles to 11-2.
They'd be better off getting all the rest of the pieces around their Qb first because they are not winning 6 games next year with the talent they have on their roster and will have another chance at a top 10 QB next year.
I love the athleticism but I'm majorly worried his accuracy.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)