Wait... you can't earn a living on video poker?
Then... this was all for nothing...
Wait... you can't earn a living on video poker?
Then... this was all for nothing...
Paying less than one percent to launder ain’t bad.
While she does have a point, drawing a line to money laundering and illegal gun sells doesn't appear supported by any evidence. She even admits as much.
Sorta hypocritical to claim that the media is lying but offer no other evidence to support a different claim.
Successful gambler. Playing penny slots. That’s a red flag.
I thought the column was fairly unpolitical.
Well, I didn't argue that it was political. Just advancing a theory not supported by evidence.
But yeah, I totally agree with her on the speed/accuracy/progress of the investigation thusfar. But conspiracy is not the only thing that accounts for it.
I was referencing NTL. He runs from anything conservative.
Interesting conspiracy theory, especially the part about about Terrorists doing this massacre and placing the gloves on an already dead Paddock. Why would Paddock wear gloves if he was planning on killing himself?
Immediately after the massacre ISIS claimed responsibility which I thought was an insecure cry for attention. Now I'm not so sure.
Because he wouldn’t have gun powder residue on his hands.
Didn't he shoot a bunch of guns? Don't guns get hot?
I mean, just spitballing. I have no earthly idea why the idea of wearing gloves precludes suicide. By this logic, why was he wearing anything?
What's the proposed alternative? That the residue was planted everywhere else, but the framers had no idea on how to plant residue on his hands?
Where's ! with the drunk history aliens gif when you need him.
Originally Posted by Sting
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)