Remove all emotion from this and answer logically: a child is pushed down a flight of stairs by their parent - the child's 14 years old. The child feels like shit. When is he supposed to think "Oh man, I feel awful and like I don't matter, better not have kids?"
Minimize the qualifiers, please.
Add emotion and logically answer: Same scenarion, when is he supposed to think that?
No, not legally. Because the law is going off of science (for once). So refute the science in defense of your subjective gray areas or just admit that your gray areas are shit and life is more complicated than that.
I'm just going to be honest - this isn't one of my clever little subjective arguments for the sake of being clever. I'm attacking your use of intentionally because under what you posted, that was intentional. Now you want to add qualifers and the like.
Why is one qualifier in a situation better than the other?
Seriously Buff, you think someone who legitimately mentally does not know the difference between right and wrong and does not understand what they are doing when killing someone deserves to die? Like king said, that not only flies in the face in the law, it flies in the face of science. At that point you become no better than a certain POTUS when just ignoring hard science.
You are now on the same level as someone who denies climate change.
Science says no one this age can be truly accountable for this action because of their stupid brain.
Buff slowly rolls into that bitch and yells "TRIAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
This is what happens when you root for the Buffs. I'm not bitter that they didn't admit me into their law school at all. I swear.
I don't know, I never subscribed to one before.
King...I'm going to my daughter's function. I'll be back later.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)