Thread: New Evidence Supports Theory That Amelia Earhart Died in Japanese Captivity

Originally Posted by NightTrainLayne

No, but this is quite obviously a publicity tour/stunt for the upcoming documentary.

Sure, but I don't think that makes the picture suspicious.

How many documentaries have there been that purport to have NEW EVIDENCE that will reveal who killed JFK? And it gets tons of tv publicity and only turns out to be rehashed info or some unproven theory with a few pieces missing? That's why I'm suspicious. They've sat on this for five years but only share it with the news media when they have a tv show to promote. That doesn't seem suspicious to you?

Originally Posted by OrangeHoof

How many documentaries have there been that purport to have NEW EVIDENCE that will reveal who killed JFK? And it gets tons of tv publicity and only turns out to be rehashed info or some unproven theory with a few pieces missing? That's why I'm suspicious. They've sat on this for five years but only share it with the news media when they have a tv show to promote. That doesn't seem suspicious to you?

You know the History Channel has been sitting on this for 5 years?

It very hard to make a determination or the sourcing of photo. The Japanese equivalent of NARA has already said they don't have any historical records collaborating the photo.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

You know the History Channel has been sitting on this for 5 years?

Maybe not the History Channel but whomever caught this photo in the National Archives (and the full photo is actually taken from quite a distance from the people in it) reportedly discovered this in 2012. Same reason we suspect Bill Cosby accusers when they surface in 2000-ish with allegations about 1980-ish.

Originally Posted by OrangeHoof

Maybe not the History Channel but whomever caught this photo in the National Archives (and the full photo is actually taken from quite a distance from the people in it) reportedly discovered this in 2012. Same reason we suspect Bill Cosby accusers when they surface in 2000-ish with allegations about 1980-ish.

This is a bad comparison.

Originally Posted by OrangeHoof

Same reason we suspect Bill Cosby accusers when they surface in 2000-ish with allegations about 1980-ish.

Wait, wut?

I thought they were pretty close on another theory that she crashed on a remote Pacific Island and was eventually eaten by Coconut Crabs after she died. Neat article on it here:

The documents note that a partial human skeleton, badly damaged by coconut crabs, had been discovered on the island in 1940, alongside the remains of birds, a turtle and a campfire. Artifacts found with the bones included the sole of a shoe thought to belong to a woman, a Benedictine liquor bottle and a box that held a nautical navigational device called a sextant. The box would have contained the same type of sextant that Noonan is said to have used as a backup navigational device, Gillespie told Live Science.

https://www.livescience.com/56752-ca...uestioned.html

Originally Posted by Timmy!

Episode #1 of Season #2 of Star Trek: Voyager ("the 37's") explains exactly what happened.

Originally Posted by elsid13

It very hard to make a determination or the sourcing of photo. The Japanese equivalent of NARA has already said they don't have any historical records collaborating the photo.

If they did, we would've known about this decades ago.

Originally Posted by MasterShake

I thought they were pretty close on another theory that she crashed on a remote Pacific Island and was eventually eaten by Coconut Crabs after she died. Neat article on it here:



https://www.livescience.com/56752-ca...uestioned.html

So, you're saying she died from crabs...

Aliens are real.

Originally Posted by Jaded

Aliens are real.

i think a few post on this forum

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis

i think a few post on this forum

Que?