Thread: Kyle Sloter is #1

Originally Posted by aberdien

He needs a better jersey number before I can endorse him.

Like what? αΩ?

Originally Posted by 7DnBrnc53

It's not just Sloter's performance. Lynch hasn't really improved at all from last year. If he sucks again against SF, and Sloter plays well, I don't know how you can keep Lynch at #2. Lynch hasn't done anything of value on an NFL field yet (if ever).

He won an NFL game.

Originally Posted by Hawgdriver

Like what? αΩ?

I will accept that. Let's get it done.

Originally Posted by 7DnBrnc53

On another forum, someone said that Lynch has no hope of starting Week 1 now. Siemian should, but Sloter should be 2nd string, and he should play by the end of the year. The Paxton Lynch experiment may be over.

JFC, he's been in the NFL for 15 months.

Originally Posted by Cugel

I totally underestimated him because I never heard of him. I don't think the Broncos thought much of him either. He was sort of throwing mud against the wall to see if it sticks. He's just is one of those guys who come in and suddenly play like a ten year veteran. Some guys come out of nowhere, seize their chance and never look back.

I'm not saying Sloter is definitely that guy yet. After all he was going up against guys who will not be in the NFL in a few weeks time. But still, the difference in team presence was just striking.

Cecil Lammey just said that one guy looked like a guy trying not to lose the starting job, and one guy who doesn't want it in Paxton, and then Kyle Sloter who looked like the best QB on the roster.

Lammey is a ******* fraud, dude, plus he works for the Fox News of sports talk radio, you need to stop quoting him.

Originally Posted by Tned

In '18, it will be:

Kelly
Siemian
Sloter

I think Siemian might get traded next offseason. Lynch won't garner anything if he can't at least move the offense

Lammey is a ******* fraud, dude, plus he works for the Fox News of sports talk radio, you need to stop quoting him.

Lammey may be off a lot of the time (I don't know because I don't listen to him much), but I think that he is correct on this one.

Originally Posted by 7DnBrnc53

Lammey may be off a lot of the time (I don't know because I don't listen to him much), but I think that he is correct on this one.

You're saying you think Lynch doesn't want the starting job? Cause that's what Fraud said.

Coaching staff already very clearly stated after the game tonight that Kyle Sloter is not in consideration for the starting job. A. that's a mistake B. I don't think he got that memo.

If Sloter still playing like this.... he could steal # 2 spot in Broncos' depth chart. Knock Lynch down to # 3. Let's find out after 3 or 4 games.

McAnus should give Sloter his number out of respect.

I'm gonna hang myself.

Originally Posted by Jaded

You're saying you think Lynch doesn't want the starting job? Cause that's what Fraud said.

No, I think that Lammey is correct about everything except the "Paxton doesn't want it" part. We don't really know. He may want it too much, and might be trying too hard.

Originally Posted by 7DnBrnc53

No, I think that Lammey is correct about everything except the "Paxton doesn't want it" part. We don't really know. He may want it too much, and might be trying too hard.

Yes, he might be pressing. That was evident when he ran with the ball to gain 2 yards instead of dumping it to Latimer.

Originally Posted by Cugel

I totally underestimated him because I never heard of him. I don't think the Broncos thought much of him either. He was sort of throwing mud against the wall to see if it sticks. He's just is one of those guys who come in and suddenly play like a ten year veteran. Some guys come out of nowhere, seize their chance and never look back.

I'm not saying Sloter is definitely that guy yet. After all he was going up against guys who will not be in the NFL in a few weeks time. But still, the difference in team presence was just striking.

Cecil Lammey just said that one guy looked like a guy trying not to lose the starting job, and one guy who doesn't want it in Paxton, and then Kyle Sloter who looked like the best QB on the roster.

I liked what Tned said about reserving one's opinion about a third-string QB's performance in preseason.
Sloter pretty much tore it up in college. But that was college, and not Division 1. His having played for
my alma mater has my heart tugging for him, but my head says no at this point. But it is always
possible he could become a good backup QB. Maybe more, but there's always doubt.