Please please please.
Campbell > Romo...
Please please please.
Campbell > Romo...
Originally Posted by Sting
Yes, I would prefer OL and DL over Romo as well.
I won't kick the dog if we get Romo but I think we can be a better team overall if we fix the lines.
If we want at least 2 new starting OL and possibly 2 new starting DL, we can't afford Romo. Something will have to give.
Troy RenckVerified account @TroyRenck 1m
Didn't see that as primary option... efforting...
Chris MortensenVerified account @mortreport
Cowboys now expect to trade Tony Romo to Broncos or Texans, sources say. Broncos talking with Jets about Trevor Siemian.
IMO, if the Broncos get rid of Trevor, it will be a mistake.
Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)#7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
THIS ONES FOR JOHNWOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?
Troy RenckVerified account @TroyRenck 1m
Being told by source would be surprising if #Broncos traded for Romo... Again a lot of plates in the air...Fluid situation @DenverChannel
Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)#7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
THIS ONES FOR JOHNWOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?
Troy RenckVerified account @TroyRenck 57s
Multiple sources tell me #Broncos not trying to trade Trevor Siemian. But again a lot of plates in air. Crazy time @DenverChannel
Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)#7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
THIS ONES FOR JOHNWOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?
Mike KlisVerified account @MikeKlis 7m
Also as of 5 minutes ago, Broncos discussing, but not yet decided on how or whether to proceed on Tony Romo, per source. #9sports
Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)#7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
THIS ONES FOR JOHNWOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?
Troy RenckVerified account @TroyRenck 36s
Again, it would allow Romo to have leverage. But a team trading for him would want to restructure deal. Why easier if he's a free agent
Troy RenckVerified account @TroyRenck 1m
As said by Charlie Casserly, Romo forcing a trade keeps his contract. He could ask for it to remain.Can't see team wanting him at that price
Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)#7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
THIS ONES FOR JOHNWOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?
Adam SchefterVerified account @AdamSchefter 6m
After considering Denver, Calais Campbell is going to sign a 4-year, $60 million deal that includes $30M gtd with Jacksonville, per source.
Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)#7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
THIS ONES FOR JOHNWOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?
Trade needs to be contingent on him agreeing to restructure.
Denver just needs to be steadfast. There is NO reason to be desperate here.
We have a hopefully future franchise kid and another kid who played solid last year.
If you want to upgrade from a solid guy to a top 10 potentially, fine, but there is no reason to be desperate to do so. Money needs to be right and compensation in any trade needs to be right or just pass. Simple.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)