Thread: Most bestiality is legal, declares Canada's Supreme Court

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bestiality-legal-canada-supreme-court-a7073196.html

Sex acts with animals are legal in Canada, so long as there is no penetration involved, according to a surprise ruling issued by the Supreme Court.
The determination stemmed from a case involving a British Columbia man convicted of 13 counts sexually assaulting his stepdaughters - including one count of bestiality. But the man, identified only as "DLW", was acquitted of the bestiality count with the new ruling.

According to court record DLW smeared peanut butter on the genitals of his victims and had the family dog lick it off while he videotaped the act.

While we're fighting over who can use the bathroom where, Canada has moved on to other more pressing matters...

Nut is furiously searching for his passport right now.

It was only a matter of time. Society is on a very slippery slope and has been for awhile.

that ******* freak needs to die a slow painful death.

That's not exactly the ruling either... the ruling is not guilty because technically the dog performed the assault.

I posted a story here about a year ago about a guy an RCMP friend of ours told us about, our friend showed up on a call with the wife freaking out and what had happened was the husband was letting the dog bang him in the ass. Because the dog was performing the act, there was no charge. If it would have been the dude doing something to the dog, than he could have charged him.

Seriously? What's next - paedophilia is OK as long as there's no penetration?

Good grief.

don't worry, that guy won't last long in prison. Pedo's usually die in the prisons here fairly quick.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

Seriously? What's next - paedophilia is OK as long as there's no penetration? Good grief.

Is it worse to have a dog lick peanut butter of your nuts, or to kill and eat the dog?


Let's be clear this guy's a weirdo who should be put down and my question does not serve to excuse him in any way

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis

Is it worse to have a dog lick peanut butter of your nuts, or to kill and eat the dog?


Let's be clear this guy's a weirdo who should be put down and my question does not serve to excuse him in any way

he wasnt spreading peanut butter on himself... he was doing this to his step-daughters man. This ******* needs a good beating and death

Originally Posted by weazel

he wasnt spreading peanut butter on himself... he was doing this to his step-daughters man. This ******* needs a good beating and death

Oh, that's just weird.

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis

Is it worse to have a dog lick peanut butter of your nuts, or to kill and eat the dog?


Let's be clear this guy's a weirdo who should be put down and my question does not serve to excuse him in any way

Honestly, I have no idea how to respond to this because it's just so off the wall.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

Honestly, I have no idea how to respond to this because it's just so off the wall.

If you had to do one, what would make you happier...

Anyone needing an animal to perform sexual acts upon has some demented and troublesome psychological problems.

People in other countries eat dog meat. If I was hungry enough, I would eat whatever animal I could find, kill and cook. There's a HUGE difference in my mind between the two scenarios.

Originally Posted by BroncoJoe

Anyone needing an animal to perform sexual acts upon has some demented and troublesome psychological problems.

People in other countries eat dog meat. If I was hungry enough, I would eat whatever animal I could find, kill and cook. There's a HUGE difference in my mind between the two scenarios.

Yeah, I totally agree, I just wanted to get people considering have a dog lick their balls

Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis

Yeah, I totally agree, I just wanted to get people considering have a dog lick their balls

Perhaps Nut aka AGap can weigh in.