Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: The Squeeze: Elway chats with Bleacher Report

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Adopted Bronco:
    Phillip, Demaryius, Derek, Shane, Von,
    Posts
    47,830

    Default The Squeeze: Elway chats with Bleacher Report

    1. John Elway's offseason thoughts

    Bleacher Report’s Jason Cole recently sat down with Broncos EVP/GM John Elway.

    Cole and Elway touched on a number of topics, including the challenges this offseason presented and how Elway, a three-time Super Bowl winner, stays motivated.

    A glimpse at some of Elway’s answers ahead of the 2016 season:

    “There are challenges every year. That’s why this year in free agency and all that, there are challenges every year trying to keep things together. So that’s always a challenge. Was it a big surprise that we were in that situation? Yeah, because I thought…we drafted Brock [Osweiler] when we got Peyton [Manning] because we didn’t know exactly what Peyton was going to be. But also, if [Manning] wasn’t in good shape, we were going to a guy who was going to be here for a long, long time. Now, that didn’t work out, so it was a matter of, you have to fix the issue. There are going to be issues every year.”
    rest - http://www.denverbroncos.com/news-an...3-00ce98f056bc

    Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
    Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)
    #7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
    THIS ONES FOR JOHN
    WOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?

  2. The Following 4 Users High Fived Denver Native (Carol) For This Post:


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Orleans, LA
    Adopted Bronco:
    DT
    Posts
    41,702

    Default

    I like the video in the article of Lil Dicky trying to rile up Von, Antonio Brown, and Gronkowski over the Madden cover.

  4. #3

    Default

    I always look for actual news in these interviews. The interesting statement was Elway saying that they drafted Osweiler because "we didn’t know exactly what Peyton was going to be."

    That's what everybody thought, but that's not what Elway said at the time. Nobody was sure how long Manning would play or how good he'd be when they signed him. That was a Elway taking a calculated risk that paid off in 50 wins, 2 SB appearances and 1 SB championship in 4 years.

    "But also, if [Manning] wasn’t in good shape, we were going to a guy who was going to be here for a long, long time."

    Once Osweiler showed he could play, they tried to re-sign him to a long term deal. They were confident they would get that done, but it didn't happen because the Texans offered $18M a year.

    It does cost them in that they don't have a really good QB prospect for 2016, but Paxton Lynch - long term - is a lot better prospect than Osweiler ever was. Osweiler showed the ability to be a good NFL QB, but nothing in his game shows he could be a top 10 QB, and hopefully he never will be.

    Lynch on the other hand has more upside potential, but he's also completely raw and not ready to start this season. It will take him a lot longer to be ready to start than Osweiler who is ready now. So, that costs them this year, but could pay dividends in the long run.

  5. The Following User High Fived Cugel For This Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    6-3/215
    Adopted Bronco:
    Mighty Quinn
    Posts
    36,822

    Default

    "Once Osweiler showed he could play they tried re-sign him to a longterm deal".

    Not how I remember it, iirc, once he showed he could play they sat his ass on the bench.
    "Tuning ... into each other ... lift all higher”
    “I’m just different!”
    “ . . . Picture a cup in the middle of the sea”

    Draft
    1st round— Cooper Dejean CB
    2nd round— Jack Sawyer OLB
    3rd round— Will Shipley RB
    4th round— Ricky Pearsall WR
    5th round— Ladd McKonkey WR
    6th round— Cash Jones RB
    7th round— Carson Steele RB

  7. The Following User High Fived Simple Jaded For This Post:


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    11,577

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Denver Native (Carol) View Post
    It's a great article - thanks Carol.

    "But of the guys who were out there at the time, there were no difference-makers. So why would I overpay for a guy who wasn’t going to be a difference-maker?"

    He's talking about FAs, but I think we can infer he did not feel Brock was a difference maker.

    I wonder then if we can also infer he thinks CJ Anderson can be.
    Quote Originally Posted by GEM View Post
    I haven't seen anywhere in the news any 5 years olds chopping off their balls.

  9. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tomjonesrocks View Post
    It's a great article - thanks Carol.

    "But of the guys who were out there at the time, there were no difference-makers. So why would I overpay for a guy who wasn’t going to be a difference-maker?"

    He's talking about FAs, but I think we can infer he did not feel Brock was a difference maker.

    I wonder then if we can also infer he thinks CJ Anderson can be.
    CJ was a difference maker in several games last year, big games.

  10. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaded View Post
    "Once Osweiler showed he could play they tried re-sign him to a longterm deal".

    Not how I remember it, iirc, once he showed he could play they sat his ass on the bench.
    They were always going to start Peyton in the playoffs for experience reasons. NO QB has ever won a SB in his first season as starting. Osweiler got butt hurt about it and left, but screw him. That was the right decision and resulted in a SB championship. If Osweiler was still butt-hurt and thought it was the wrong decision AFTER they won the SB with Peyton, then double screw him.

    But, they made their offer ($13M a year initially) AFTER and not before they had seen Osweiler start.

    Their decision to make him the long-term starter (by offering to pay him $64M, with $30M guaranteed) had nothing to do with benching him for the playoffs.

  11. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tomjonesrocks View Post
    It's a great article - thanks Carol.

    "But of the guys who were out there at the time, there were no difference-makers. So why would I overpay for a guy who wasn’t going to be a difference-maker?"

    He's talking about FAs, but I think we can infer he did not feel Brock was a difference maker.

    I wonder then if we can also infer he thinks CJ Anderson can be.
    No. He offered Osweiler a $64M 4-year contract with $30M guaranteed. He isn't in the habit of giving $30M guaranteed contracts to players he DOESN'T think will "make a difference."

    That is a shit load of money.

    Elway wanted Brock to be the franchise QB, but the Texans offered $18M a year, $72M, with $37 M guaranteed. That's $12M more than the Broncos offered over 4 years and $7M more guaranteed.

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tracy, CA
    Posts
    19,015

    Default

    Big difference in pay but everything I saw from Oz told me he wasn't worth that kind of money, at least here. Maybe for the Texans but not us. I was never wowed by what Oz could do and the loss to the raiders got me pissed off.

    In the end we saved a ton of salary that can go towards Von.
    "Oh I’m sorry, did I break your concentration?”
    Jules Winnfield - Pulp Fiction

  13. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Anderson, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    Demaryius Thomas
    Posts
    36,443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cugel View Post
    I always look for actual news in these interviews. The interesting statement was Elway saying that they drafted Osweiler because "we didn’t know exactly what Peyton was going to be."

    That's what everybody thought, but that's not what Elway said at the time. Nobody was sure how long Manning would play or how good he'd be when they signed him. That was a Elway taking a calculated risk that paid off in 50 wins, 2 SB appearances and 1 SB championship in 4 years.

    "But also, if [Manning] wasn’t in good shape, we were going to a guy who was going to be here for a long, long time."

    Once Osweiler showed he could play, they tried to re-sign him to a long term deal. They were confident they would get that done, but it didn't happen because the Texans offered $18M a year.

    It does cost them in that they don't have a really good QB prospect for 2016, but Paxton Lynch - long term - is a lot better prospect than Osweiler ever was. Osweiler showed the ability to be a good NFL QB, but nothing in his game shows he could be a top 10 QB, and hopefully he never will be.

    Lynch on the other hand has more upside potential, but he's also completely raw and not ready to start this season. It will take him a lot longer to be ready to start than Osweiler who is ready now. So, that costs them this year, but could pay dividends in the long run.
    Cug, Elway thinks Lynch could be ready sooner than some people think. That leaves the door wide open for Lynch to possibly take the reins this season.

  14. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Adopted Bronco:
    Phillip "TD" Lindsay
    Posts
    11,311

    Default

    Well, I guess this settles it; Elway has officially recognized “The Bleacher Report” as a legitimate media source.
    I’m an Autistic Self-Advocate. If you have any questions about Autism/Asperger’s, feel free to ask. I’m not offended by any question asked by anyone who has a genuine desire to understand us better.

    https://aacphoenix.com/

Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group