Thread: Poll about bans

So HOF members would in essence become moderators? No thanks, we have moderators we don't need those in an honorary position now becoming basically moderators. As it has said, already the poll speaks for itself.

That had to be a wind up

HOF members would be like the Supreme Court.

Would the court be liberal or conservative leaning?

I nominate myself Chief Justice, and am currently drafting our version of Marbury v. Madison

Originally Posted by turftoad

Why is this such a big deal. In the last year, there have hardly been many bans at all. I think we do a pretty decent job of NOT banning members. Take a look at the ban list.

http://www.broncosforums.com/forums/...abled-accounts

Agreed! Leave things as they are.

Speaking of moderators......what ever happened to frauscheize?

Originally Posted by turftoad

Why is this such a big deal. In the last year, there have hardly been many bans at all. I think we do a pretty decent job of NOT banning members. Take a look at the ban list.

http://www.broncosforums.com/forums/...abled-accounts

The moderators have always been reserved in their exercising of the ban.

Something can be talked about without being a "big deal".

Originally Posted by Slick

My comment about term limits wasn't because I think they're doing a bad job. It might be good for other posters to get a taste of it so they can see what it's all about if they want to.

I think term limits is a great idea! Please! Let me out, I'm trapped!

Originally Posted by NightTrainLayne

I think term limits is a great idea! Please! Let me out, I'm trapped!

I nominated you back in the day. SUFFER!!!!!!

Originally Posted by NightTrainLayne

I think term limits is a great idea! Please! Let me out, I'm trapped!

Hotcarl for mod.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Hotcarl for mod.

Falco for mod!

Originally Posted by Dapper Dan

Something can be talked about without being a "big deal".

Apparently it meant enough to Dave to bring it up.

Originally Posted by TXBRONC

Apparently it meant enough to Dave to bring it up.

And it meant enough to you to discuss it.

Originally Posted by TXBRONC

Apparently it meant enough to Dave to bring it up.

There shouldn't be a backlash over a discussion. I don't understand the apprehension or defensiveness that so many in this thread had made demonstrative. It's not an attack on the board, the moderators, or the posters in general.