(the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)
Not that the crowd noise hurt a bit (just the opposite,) but I'm convinced the big difference between our rush and KCs was that our secondary and coverage LBs are a lot better. Both starting CBs and both starting OLBs mentioned it during the week: Against a 0-step guy like Brady, Manning or Rodgers, the coverage has to buy the rush a little time, because THEY know their lines suck, too, and the rush can't make the coverage blanket Gronk and Edelman all day.
It's complementary football all the way down.
Oh, valid point. I thought you meant all starters, you should take the time to be more descriptive, don't be shy. —Jaded
Never confuse frustrated candor and disloyal malice.
Love can't be coerced. —Me
Oh, valid point. I thought you meant all starters, you should take the time to be more descriptive, don't be shy. —Jaded
Never confuse frustrated candor and disloyal malice.
Love can't be coerced. —Me
As Ric Flair used to say....to be the man, you have to beat the man. The man got beat over and over and over.
First of all, Florio has a hard on for the Pats, and he doesnt like the Broncos because we beat them a lot more than we lose to them.
But hey, I guess if you want to blame someone New England, then blame Miami. You remember them? They would have lost to you in Foxboro too, right?
Home field would have let you demoralize them.
Miami sucks.
And youre gonna watch us do our thing on Superbowl sunday.
IN PATON I TRUST.
oh, shut up! we beat new england twice this year, eff those losers-- we're the better team. . .
Maybe. But I just don't get the "they probably would have beaten us there" line of thinking. Why would they have beaten us? Our crowd is worth 10 points? What did the patriots show? Would the colder weather have caused turnovers? What about the game made it appear as though EVERYTHING would have been different? This just sounds like *patriot fans grasping. I mean, I heard alllllll week long that since they had Edelman and Gronk healthy, that they were just "unstoppable" (Edelman who?) So now what? The stadium was the difference maker for and "unstoppable" team? I'm just dumbfounded by this line of thinking.
Last edited by Ravage!!!; 01-26-2016 at 02:34 PM.
(the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)
I get that too and I don't deny it would have give the ****Pasties a huge advantage but blowing Denver out doesn't seem realistic. If Denver had played at Foxborough it still would not have been a shock to if walked away with a win. Keep this in mind up until two season ago the ****Patsies hadn't played a road playoff game in like five or six season. ****Belicheat and Shady understand it's huge advantage.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)