Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 173

Thread: AFC Team Most Likely to be one-and-done:Denver Broncos

  1. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TimHippo View Post
    Not gonna even read.
    I don't blame you. There aren't any 3 cone stats in the article.

  2. The Following 13 Users High Fived Slick For This Post:


  3. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BroncoJoe View Post
    I didn't read the article, but I don't think Billick considers wildcard games as actual "playoff" games. Those are played to get into his version of the playoffs.
    He's basically saying he likes any of the 4 teams playing in the wildcard round more than he does Denver. He thinks any of them have a better shot at actually winning a game whereas Denver, not so much.

  4. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Tri-Cities
    Posts
    1,272

    Default

    Horseshit. The team most likely to be one-and-done is the Bengals. They haven't won a playoff game since 1990. They have a ridiculous monkey to get off their back and no other coaching staff has more pressure to win a game. If they lose, holy shit...
    A mind needs books as a sword needs a whetstone, if it is to keep its edge. --Tyrion Lannister, from George R.R. Martin's A Game of Thrones
    Everybody has a preference. Some guys like them round. Some guys like them thin. Some guys like them tacky. Some guys like them brand new. Some guys like old balls. --Tom Brady

  5. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dapper Dan View Post
    I didn't even read this.
    Liar liar panties on fire.

  6. The Following User High Fived Al Wilson 4 Mayor For This Post:


  7. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Maryland, NB
    Adopted Bronco:
    Sammy Winder
    Posts
    2,107

    Default

    Billick is a jackwagon.
    It's going to be us and New England in the AFC Championship.
    Then we'll show Tom and Bill what fear really is.

    ***Drops Mic***
    "Chickens are dope..." - Von Miller

  8. The Following 4 Users High Fived EastCoastBronco For This Post:


  9. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Adopted Bronco:
    Dennis Smith #49
    Posts
    1,351

    Default

    I disagree with his assessment due to the use of "toxic differential" as his supporting reason.
    A woman's mind is cleaner than a man's: She changes it more often.
    Oliver Herford

  10. The Following 3 Users High Fived D1g1tal j1m For This Post:


  11. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D1g1tal j1m View Post
    I disagree with his assessment due to the use of "toxic differential" as his supporting reason.
    Do you feel as though he is a 'toxic differential '?

  12. The Following User High Fived Al Wilson 4 Mayor For This Post:


  13. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    11,577

    Default

    Billick isn't a guy I put a lot of stock in but if I'm writing an article for national consumption I wouldn't rate Denver's chances all that high.

    Home field is huge - but with so many narrow wins and large periods of looking awful in nearly every game it's hard to pick this team to make much of a run - even considering the defensive ranking.

    But who knows. Wins against the Ravens and Colts were almost gimmes on paper and Denver managed to lose those - odd things happen in the playoffs.
    Quote Originally Posted by GEM View Post
    I haven't seen anywhere in the news any 5 years olds chopping off their balls.

  14. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Adopted Bronco:
    Demaryius Thomas
    Posts
    31,358

    Default

    I wouldn't be shocked if we won the SB and I wouldn't be shocked if we lost our first playoff game. We are an enigma wrapped in a riddle. The only thing that would shock me at this point is if we blew someone out, that's just not our style. We prefer giving our fans heart attacks.
    Let's Rid3!!!!

  15. The Following 11 Users High Fived chazoe60 For This Post:


  16. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by D1g1tal j1m View Post
    I disagree with his assessment due to the use of "toxic differential" as his supporting reason.
    From reading that, he thinks we would lose to Cincy if we played head to head. Oh wait.

  17. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slick View Post
    I don't blame you. There aren't any 3 cone stats in the article.
    My three ice cream-cone time is legendary.

    In all seriousness, Lawdog pretty much crushed the analysis of Bill.

  18. The Following User High Fived Poet For This Post:


  19. #27

    Default

    The one thing that we need to stop doing, and if we do we will be just fine, is stop being ******* stupid.

    Whether it is dumb ass penalties that keep drives alive or stall our own drives, or its turning the ******* ball over, we are killing ourselves we just need to stop being stupid.

  20. The Following 5 Users High Fived Rick For This Post:


  21. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Clown World
    Posts
    9,863

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    The one thing that we need to stop doing, and if we do we will be just fine, is stop being ******* stupid.

    Whether it is dumb ass penalties that keep drives alive or stall our own drives, or its turning the ******* ball over, we are killing ourselves we just need to stop being stupid.
    Not our style.

  22. The Following User High Fived Mike For This Post:


  23. #29

    Default

    The Broncos can't be one and done sooner than the KC Chiefs or the Texans, because those teams play each other and one of them has to lose!

    So, either the Texans win and the Bengals win and the Texans come here to Denver. Or the Chiefs and Bengals win and the Chiefs come here, or both the Bengals and Steelers win and the Steelers come here.

    I'd say the matchup of Broncos v. Chiefs or Broncos v. Texans favors the Broncos.

    The matchup of Broncos v. Steelers probably favors the Broncos too at home. The defense will be healthier, the OL will be healed up a bit and so will Manning and Brock.

    Secondly, and most importantly, the Broncos are the worst team in the 12-team playoff field in a stat that I put a lot of weight in: toxic differential. In simple terms, the stat combines the team's ability to earn and stop explosion plays while also creating takeaways and limiting turnovers. The Broncos are one of just three teams to qualify for the playoffs with a negative toxic at -4 -- 39 points behind the playoff-leading Bengals at +35. This will haunt Denver, no matter who the opponent is in the Divisional Round.
    And yet the Broncos beat both the other top AFC teams, the Patriots and Bengals, at home where they will be playing all their games until the SB.

    This "toxic differential" sounds a lot like the "give-away - take-away" ratio, with the addition of big plays (20+ 40+ allowed). Well I can't remember many big plays down the field the Broncos defense has surrendered outside of Talib's covering the wrong receiver in this last game. Mostly when teams have scored TDs on them it's been the normal < 20 yard variety.

    (I think Adrian Peterson scored on a long rushing TD too, perhaps you can remember more).

    The Broncos are horrible for a top seed in giveaway takeaway because of all the turnovers they have committed, 5 in the game against the Chargers alone. But none of those was on Manning and only 1 on Brock really. The rest were bumbles by the the WRs, and uncharacteristic fumbles by the running backs.

    Well, either they turn the ball over in the playoffs or they don't. If they do they will lose for sure. If not they can win against anybody.

    The one thing you can say about this year's Broncos is that they always play up-down to the opposition. They haven't blown anybody out, and they've lost to really BAD teams, but they've also beaten 4 of the top playoff teams - Vikings and Packers, Patriots and Bengals. It's like they are unable to concentrate properly on beating up on bad teams. Well, there are no more bad teams left, so it shouldn't be a problem.

    I can't see the Broncos looking past any team now, certainly not the Chiefs who humiliated them or the Steelers who beat them on the road and scored 34 points on their defense.
    Last edited by Cugel; 01-04-2016 at 05:02 PM.

  24. The Following User High Fived Cugel For This Post:


  25. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Anderson, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    Demaryius Thomas
    Posts
    36,443

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tomjonesrocks View Post
    Billick isn't a guy I put a lot of stock in but if I'm writing an article for national consumption I wouldn't rate Denver's chances all that high.

    Home field is huge - but with so many narrow wins and large periods of looking awful in nearly every game it's hard to pick this team to make much of a run - even considering the defensive ranking.

    But who knows. Wins against the Ravens and Colts were almost gimmes on paper and Denver managed to lose those - odd things happen in the playoffs.
    If Denver were narrowly winning games against bad teams and then losing to good teams then I would be concerned. Style points are meaningless.

  26. The Following User High Fived TXBRONC For This Post:


Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group