Thread: Mo's official Owen Daniels appreciation thread

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

No. No. You wanted them INSTEAD of Manning.

Sure, and I was wrong: We could easily have had BOTH, and a couple championships by now. Since we decided Manning was a one-man offense, it doesn't MATTER.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

If I have to sit here and read you berating me because I was wrong about Owen Daniels, you're going to take full credit for not wanting Manning to begin with.

It's not that I didn't want him, it's that I thought he'd be WASTED on us because we couldn't give him anything but Clady, DT and Decker, and expecting an old, immobile bionic QB fresh off FOUR SPINAL SURGERIES to last a whole season, much less win a SB, was a fools errand. Was that belief false?

Originally Posted by Joel

Sure, and I was wrong: We could easily have had BOTH, and a couple championships by now. Since we decided Manning was a one-man offense, it doesn't MATTER.


It's not that I didn't want him, it's that I thought he'd be WASTED on us because we couldn't give him anything but Clady, DT and Decker, and expecting an old, immobile bionic QB fresh off FOUR SPINAL SURGERIES to last a whole season, much less win a SB, was a fools errand. Was that belief false?

Sure. Whatever you say.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

I was being facetious. I don't give a shit how a tight end blocks.

Did you know that facetious is one of two words that contain all the vowels in alphabetical order? The other....

 

abstemiously. guess you could add a y to the other one, too