Originally Posted by
BroncoWave
Well that explains it then. Kind of an unfair comparison. No shit something that costs way more is probably going to be way better.
But its the point of the game manufactures as to why they know that the consoles will never compete with PCs in gaming. Not only ar the processors better in PCs...thus allowing much MUCH larger games, but the graphics processors are larger as well. SO not only do the games LOOK btter, but can literally dwarf the console games in regards to content and scale.
They proved that games that have come out on all three, the gaming manufactures tried to "turn down" the graphics on the PC version purely because they didn't want the console versions to look like shit.
Before you say "but its not fair because of cost." That's really a bs question. Meaning, if you read a magazine that compares the fastest cars, and who hits 60mph the fastest. Do you ask "Yeah, but how much do each of those cars cost" to then compare the results? No. You look at the results and judge the results based on the criteria of which it's being compared.
If you are comparing game speed, processor speed, frame rate, and graphics quality.... PC is by far the superior product..... period.
If you want to make a different category and compare prices, then that's a different subject.
(the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)