Again, hurries aren't irrelevant, but are overrated, IMHO. Do YOU think Brady needed a tap on the shoulder to tell him the Giants SUPER BOWL D was coming for his head, and going to GET it more often than not? The first time it had only been a MONTH since he'd played them in a barn burner he was lucky to win by a FG; think he FORGOT that till someone tapping him a split second after a whistle reminding him that Oh, yeah, my ribs are STILL sore from the last time we played these guys....
Yet a big part of what separates elite QBs from also-starteds is the ability to compartmentalize their awareness of that: What near-sacks do to them would more accurately called "fasts" than "hurries," because it doesn't make them frantic, careless nor otherwise "rushed," they just more quickly but just as CALMLY do the same elite things as always. Against guys like that, it's not enough to just tap them a second after the play; they must be MOVED before their throws are affected (and even then the effect's often minimal.)
So hurries matter; they can rattle average or worse QBs enough to be truly decisive. But Eli Manning was a lot more than "hurried" in that first SB against NE; he should've been sacked 2-3 times on one play, yet after (somehow) escaping he was calm and careful enough to reload and through a deep precise pass that saved the game and remains its signature play. "Hurry, hurry!"
Oh, valid point. I thought you meant all starters, you should take the time to be more descriptive, don't be shy. Jaded
Never confuse frustrated candor and disloyal malice.
Love can't be coerced. Me
20 touchdowns 24 ints. Very mediocre and would never be good enough. Our defense won't hold up this level of play for 16 games.
If you like poor over poorer then more power to you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)