Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4
Results 46 to 54 of 54

Thread: New rule response to Pats formation

  1. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King87 View Post
    MN, you can't run up on me with the 'you're better than this' when you're hitting me with the 'but this play is also a tactical advantage'. Wanna tell me why we haven't banned fake punts? Come on man, that's not the same thing and you know it. I know you know it. You know you know it. I know that you know that I know that you know that you know it.

    The Lions doing it...is underhanded. **** them.

    Again, the Ravens are one of the best coached teams, with a lots of smart veterans on that team. Being able to hit them with the okie-doke like that...yeah...come on. Just ******* come on.
    King, the 'you're better than this' was with regards to your 'It's pretty sad that Patriots fans feel the need to defend every single shitty thing their team does.' and my response 'You know that I don't defend every single shitty thing the Patriots do.'

    I understand that the fake punt/field goal and the ineligible receiver are not the same exact thing. You implied, however, that because the Patriots did it for a tactical reason the play was therefore underhanded and I was merely pointing out the every team runs plays for a tactical reason. They run wide receiver pick plays trying to run the defenders into each other or the officials for tactical reasons. Those plays are very similar to the ineligible receiver plays.

    I also find it very interesting that you continue to ignore the fact that not only did the referee announce that the player was ineligible, but expressly told the defense to "Not cover him"! Most of us learned at a very early age that when told not to do something, such as touch a hot burner on the stove, etc., you probably shouldn't do that. If the NFL defender isn't able to understand and comprehend that then there are more serious issues at play here.
    Too bad she doesn't cheer for the Patriots dressed like this

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    A galaxy far far away
    Adopted Bronco:
    Rey
    Posts
    21,543

    Default

    I dont want to add to my ignore list - but i have a feeling i might have to

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by King87 View Post
    Senator MN, your time has expired.
    Oh don't even get me started on politics.

    I just get really angry that the NFL makes decisions to move the Pro Bowl to Brazil, play more games over seas, etc. but isn't willing to take real actions to improve the game and its officiating. Creating the base for uniform and conclusive camera shots for replays, clearly and simply defining what is a catch, etc.
    Too bad she doesn't cheer for the Patriots dressed like this

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Bloomington, MN
    Posts
    2,580

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis View Post
    I dont want to add to my ignore list - but i have a feeling i might have to
    Why would you need to do that? I haven't seen anyone personally attacking you. Did I miss something?
    Too bad she doesn't cheer for the Patriots dressed like this

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    18,625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis View Post
    You are better than that.
    No, that's what I am.

  6. The Following 5 Users High Fived WTE For This Post:


  7. #51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MNPatsFan View Post
    Oh don't even get me started on politics.

    I just get really angry that the NFL makes decisions to move the Pro Bowl to Brazil, play more games over seas, etc. but isn't willing to take real actions to improve the game and its officiating. Creating the base for uniform and conclusive camera shots for replays, clearly and simply defining what is a catch, etc.
    We share that frustration, but that does not preclude this from being a good idea.

  8. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    A galaxy far far away
    Adopted Bronco:
    Rey
    Posts
    21,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WTE View Post
    No, that's what I am.
    LOL - what you are my friend - is Awsome

  9. #53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Valar Morghulis View Post
    LOL - what you are my friend - is Awsome
    Don't boost him up.

  10. The Following User High Fived Poet For This Post:


  11. #54
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Denver
    Adopted Bronco:
    Dangerous Freedom Lock
    Posts
    25,131

    Default

    still waiting on deflate gate, even though the NFL has skirted it under the rug to protect the ring.

Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group