I know that Stephen Jones needs to be his own man, but is he trying to do this being deliberately being the polar opposite of his dad? I'm as big of a critic of JJ as anyone for how he has run the Cowboys, but "if my dad did it, I'm going to do the exact opposite" is an even worse strategy for running a team. I don't know what DeMarco Murray was asking for, but if anyone deserved a big payday, it was him.All of which begged the questions Thursday: "Which chair is Jerry Jones tied to, and how dark is the closet where he's being kept?"
It's a joke, of course. It's undeniable that Jones will always be the rock-star front man for the Cowboys. But this streak of fiscal responsibility has some fingerprints on it, and those who know the Cowboys say those identifying marks belong largely to Jones' son Stephen. Outside of Dallas and NFL circles, not a lot is known about the man, other than he's the offspring of arguably the league's wildest owner, and carries a business card that lists a one-man corporation: "Stephen Jones: Dallas Cowboys Chief Operating Officer/Executive Vice President/Director of Player Personnel."
That's a mouthful in any organization but also not entirely uncommon for owners' sons who are expected to inherit the kingdom and all its glory. Stephen Jones is that guy in Dallas. He's the one who gets the party bus and the $4 billion franchise that accompanies it.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/letting...035337598.html