Thread: Chargers AND Raiders Building Stadium In L.A.?

All 3 teams should either move to Mexico or Canada.

LOS ANGELES — An NFL team owner has designed a Los Angeles-area stadium for two clubs — with two home locker rooms, identical sets of office space and two owners' suites.

St. Louis Rams' owner Stan Kroenke doesn't need to partner with a second team to finance the $1.86-billion venue in Inglewood, but the league considers Los Angeles a two-team market and wants a stadium that could accommodate both, according to the Los Angeles Times.

His plan competes with one by the San Diego Chargers and Oakland Raiders, who want to share a stadium in Carson.

Kroenke hasn't said he plans to move the Rams, but analysts doubt he would invest in a stadium and not use it for his team.

rest - http://www.denverpost.com/broncos/ci...-l-would-house

http://www.broncosforums.com/forums/...79#post2330679

Carson approved and moving forward. St. Louis moving forward.

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/footb...ded5c65c6.html

Another member of the committee, speaking on the condition of anonymity at those March meetings, said the league would not “abandon” St. Louis if it came up with a workable stadium plan.

Originally Posted by ShaneFalco

Carson approved and moving forward. St. Louis moving forward.

http://www.stltoday.com/sports/footb...ded5c65c6.html

Keep clinging. Lol.

http://www.sbnation.com/lookit/2015/...LIGHTNING-BOLT

New Chargers stadium will have a tower that SHOOTS LIGHTNING BOLTS



http://www.latimes.com/sports/nfl/la...424-story.html

Oooooooohhh artist concepts. So much more convincing than land purchases.

Each team would have 9 home games. While the travel from Oak to SD is small the teams still currently have to do it. With a new shared stadium that woudn't be the case. I would think the other teams in the division would take some issue with that. Had it been Oak and SF that would be more palatable.

Originally Posted by jhildebrand

Each team would have 9 home games. While the travel from Oak to SD is small the teams still currently have to do it. With a new shared stadium that woudn't be the case. I would think the other teams in the division would take some issue with that. Had it been Oak and SF that would be more palatable.

It's already been said that one of them would likely move to the NFC if the shared stadium happens.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

It's already been said that one of them would likely move to the NFC if the shared stadium happens.

I didn't hear that. THAT would be terrible. Ruins too many rivalries. A shared Oak/SF stadium was the best option.

Originally Posted by jhildebrand

I didn't hear that. THAT would be terrible. Ruins too many rivalries. A shared Oak/SF stadium was the best option.

Well the niners just built their new stadium so I don't know how realistic that would have been. And they do well enough on their own attendance-wise they didn't really need to team up with another team like seems to be the case with Oakland and SD.

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Well the niners just built their new stadium so I don't know how realistic that would have been. And they do well enough on their own attendance-wise they didn't really need to team up with another team like seems to be the case with Oakland and SD.

And STL

Insiders are claiming that Carson is now the nfls 1st choice because the St. Louis plan is moving quickly. They have gotten assurances from unions, have started acquiring the land, have hired a few consulting firms, and have named the stadium builders. The NFL owner vote will be the final say and most owners see a team in stl.

Originally Posted by ShaneFalco

Insiders are claiming that Carson is now the nfls 1st choice because the St. Louis plan is moving quickly. They have gotten assurances from unions, have started acquiring the land, have hired a few consulting firms, and have named the stadium builders. The NFL owner vote will be the final say and most owners see a team in stl.

Link?

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Link?

Nope. No such thing. Speculation, conjecture, and bullshit. Fact is the only person who has purchased land, gotten zoning approval, and secured PRIVATE financing is Kroenke. Everything else is a plan that is far behind. Doesn't mean the Rams are moving, but it does mean Kroenke is currently the most likely stadium owner in LA.