Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 48

Thread: Report: Larry Fitzgerald doesn’t expect to be back with Cardinals next year

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    22,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Magnificent Seven View Post
    Release Wes Welker and Caldwell. Sign Larry Fitzgerald.
    That's already a no brainer. Welker and Caldwell both are gone.
    (the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    A galaxy far far away
    Adopted Bronco:
    Rey
    Posts
    21,637

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravage!!! View Post
    That's already a no brainer. Welker and Caldwell both are gone.
    I think Wes might be here on a 1 year deal (with a significant pay cut)

  3. The Following 2 Users High Fived Valar Morghulis For This Post:


  4. #33
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tracy, CA
    Posts
    19,015

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daveaitken18 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DenBronx View Post
    I don't know Davii. I get that he would be a #1 on alot of team but do you think Fitz could offer more than Sanders as a #2 guy? He would probably be a #3 here....

    Ok ill duck behind the couch for this one.
    I will join you behind the couch - Sanders is younger, faster, less beat up and still playing for his huge payday - i pick He-Mannuel over Fitz.
    Agreed. Younger, faster and cheaper. Elways on interested in getting a bargain anyway and Fitz isnt a bargain. Only way I see him coming here is if contract talks go haywire with DT.
    "Oh I’m sorry, did I break your concentration?”
    Jules Winnfield - Pulp Fiction

  5. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Denver
    Adopted Bronco:
    Dangerous Freedom Lock
    Posts
    25,131

    Default

    i dont get why people hating on wes. Wes has been open on alot of plays and just not had the ball thrown to him.

  6. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    22,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daveaitken18 View Post
    I think Wes might be here on a 1 year deal (with a significant pay cut)
    I don't see why that would happen. Welker is pretty irrelevent at this point, and he's going to get another concussion long before he doesn't. So any contract with him would be just a couple games away from him being released anyway.
    (the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)

  7. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    22,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ShaneFalco View Post
    i dont get why people hating on wes. Wes has been open on alot of plays and just not had the ball thrown to him.
    He's just not a guy that gets open with speed anymore....which was his thing. Now he can be covered by nearly any nickle back on the field, and because that doesn't cause mis-matches...its leaving others to defend other areas as Wes just isn't creating problems.
    (the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)

  8. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tracy, CA
    Posts
    19,015

    Default

    Yeah Wes hasnt looked the same this year. I like Welker alot but think father time has caught up to him and has had one too many concussions.
    "Oh I’m sorry, did I break your concentration?”
    Jules Winnfield - Pulp Fiction

  9. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Westminster, CO
    Adopted Bronco:
    Phillip, Demaryius, Derek, Shane, Von,
    Posts
    47,837

    Default Is this Larry Fitzgerald's last game with the Cardinals?

    There is a chance that Saturday marks the final game for Larry Fitzgerald in an Arizona Cardinals jersey.

    Speaking on NFL Network's NFL GameDay First on Saturday morning, Ian Rapoport reported that the Cardinals are expected to ask Fitzgerald to take a pay cut from his $15 million salary in 2015.

    "I'm told the ball is in his court, as far as how much he wants to accept and how willing he is to help their salary-cap situation," Rapoport said.
    AND

    Cardinals general manager Steve Keim said last month the team's "intent" is to have Fitzgerald retire a Cardinal. He also said, "We have to make good business decisions."
    full article - http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300...-the-cardinals

    Thanks to MasterShake for my great signature
    Rest in Peace - Demaryius (88) - Darrent (27) - Damien (29) - Kenny (11)
    #7 - JOHN - #44 - FLOYD - #80 - ROD
    THIS ONES FOR JOHN
    WOULD YOU RATHER WIN UGLY, OR LOSE PRETTY?

  10. #39
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Foreverland
    Posts
    8,040

    Default

    Just please no. No more WR's. I sat all offseason last yar about how Denver needed a WR, so they went and wastred a 2nd round on some guy rotting at the end of the bench.

  11. The Following User High Fived silkamilkamonico For This Post:


  12. #40
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    22,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by silkamilkamonico View Post
    Just please no. No more WR's. I sat all offseason last yar about how Denver needed a WR, so they went and wastred a 2nd round on some guy rotting at the end of the bench.
    This is sound logic. We needed a WR so we got one that hasn't panned out (yet), so now we don't need a WR???
    (the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)

  13. The Following User High Fived Ravage!!! For This Post:


  14. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    A galaxy far far away
    Adopted Bronco:
    Rey
    Posts
    21,637

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravage!!! View Post
    This is sound logic. We needed a WR so we got one that hasn't panned out (yet), so now we don't need a WR???
    LOL - i do think we will need to add another WR in this years draft, but i still think Latimer is going to come good, i think he is another big bodied receiver with good speed that is good after the catch.

  15. The Following 2 Users High Fived Valar Morghulis For This Post:


  16. #42
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    colorado
    Posts
    26,922

    Default

    I want a FS and I can guarantee we will draft two TEs but I'd rather sign a guy like fasano or Mercedes Lewis or so,etching and draft another Orange Julius type with our comp.


    So FS, OL, DE, and if knighton walks we will need a DT to plug the middle.

    The pats are fags and signed Chung to a 3 year extension. I wanted him.
    The Plan at the moment:

    Draft: Trade a 3rd and 6th this year to a team to move up and get a 2nd next year (this will happen).

    Players I want:
    Jake Ferguson (Jake Butt) or Jelani Woods or Jeremy Ruckert or Cade Otten (owen daniels) at TE- All 4th rd or later.
    Troy Anderson LB 3rd/4th rd (yay Timmy!)
    Neil Farrell, JR DL- run stuffer- bye purcell

  17. The Following User High Fived underrated29 For This Post:


  18. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Adopted Bronco:
    Justin Simmons
    Posts
    5,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daveaitken18 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ravage!!! View Post
    This is sound logic. We needed a WR so we got one that hasn't panned out (yet), so now we don't need a WR???
    LOL - i do think we will need to add another WR in this years draft, but i still think Latimer is going to come good, i think he is another big bodied receiver with good speed that is good after the catch.
    this. ^^^^^^ we've got a top two or three wide out in the game at one spot, an emerging star at another, a nightmare at Te when healthy and although old, the hands down best slot to ever lace them up.

    Add to that the fact that we have a hc and qb who need to win now and I think unless you had the next an green or Calvin Johnson, they'd have a hard time seeing the field in Denver. His lack of playing time at one of the hardest positions to transition to in the NFL has little to do with a lack of talent or potential in Latimer

  19. The Following 2 Users High Fived Jsteve01 For This Post:


  20. #44
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    22,211

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jsteve01 View Post
    this. ^^^^^^ we've got a top two or three wide out in the game at one spot, an emerging star at another, a nightmare at Te when healthy and although old, the hands down best slot to ever lace them up.

    Add to that the fact that we have a hc and qb who need to win now and I think unless you had the next an green or Calvin Johnson, they'd have a hard time seeing the field in Denver. His lack of playing time at one of the hardest positions to transition to in the NFL has little to do with a lack of talent or potential in Latimer
    I hope you are right Jst, because what you are saying makes sense. The ONLY thing that brings hesitance to that is that I would hope that Latimer COULD get into the lineup for Welker more often considering how ineffective Welker has been. But, as you said, this offense was the most prolific in NFL history last season, and the WRs and QB are pretty well synced up. It's hard to keep that in perspective when you see so many young WRs throughout the NFL have such good years this season.
    (the previous comment was not directed at any particular individual and was not intended to slander,disrespect or offend any reader of said statement)

  21. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado
    Adopted Bronco:
    Justin Simmons
    Posts
    5,564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ravage!!! View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jsteve01 View Post
    this. ^^^^^^ we've got a top two or three wide out in the game at one spot, an emerging star at another, a nightmare at Te when healthy and although old, the hands down best slot to ever lace them up.

    Add to that the fact that we have a hc and qb who need to win now and I think unless you had the next an green or Calvin Johnson, they'd have a hard time seeing the field in Denver. His lack of playing time at one of the hardest positions to transition to in the NFL has little to do with a lack of talent or potential in Latimer
    I hope you are right Jst, because what you are saying makes sense. The ONLY thing that brings hesitance to that is that I would hope that Latimer COULD get into the lineup for Welker more often considering how ineffective Welker has been. But, as you said, this offense was the most prolific in NFL history last season, and the WRs and QB are pretty well synced up. It's hard to keep that in perspective when you see so many young WRs throughout the NFL have such good years this season.
    I get it but Peyton is huge on chemistry. He's got more with wes

Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Larry Fitzgerald, Cardinals agree to restructured deal
    By Denver Native (Carol) in forum Other NFL Team Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-05-2014, 04:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group