Originally Posted by
artie_dale
Since Russell Wilson won the Super Bowl (in my opinion, he didn't really win it, their Defense did), the debate I've heard is are coaches and teams looking more for a scrambling QB these days because of their ability to extend plays or create opportunities.
Current list of Scrambling QB's consist of:
Russell Wilson (won SB but short & makes safe decisions and seems clutch so far)
Cam Newton (prototype Scrambler because of arm strength, size, and speed)
Colin Kaepernick (size & speed)
Robert Griffin III (accuracy, decision making (1st yr), and speed)
Andrew Luck (not known as a scrambler but the kid can move when he needs to. BUT, has all the pocket QB tangibles ANY coach would want)
Past Scrambler QBs:
Michael Vick (his playoff appearance sparked exact same argument back in his prime, no SB win)
Donavon McNabb (not like Vick, but good enough to be same category, no SB win)
Vince Young (...smh)
Randall Cunningham (no SB)
Steve Young (won one SB, but forced to retire due to concussions)
Fran Tarkenton (great scrambling QB, no SB win)
Kordell Stewart (no SB win)
Steve McNair (no SB wins)
Roger Stabauch (two SB wins)
Jim Zorn (not exactly a scrambler type, but did have to fun a lot due to poor blocking. No SBs)
John Elway (he ran well and is tough as nails. Two SBs)
So, of this list of 15 QBs who fit a mild scrambler QB identity, 6 Super Bowls were won between 4 of them.
I'd also like to point out that injuries plagued 7 of the 16 (not just counting season or career ending. 1 in the new 5, and 6 in the old 11. Kordell, Randall, Vince, and Donavon were hampered by lingering leg injuries at times that I think led to their demise).
So, all this talk about "New Era" and "Scrambling QB's is what should be preferred", I'm not buying it. I do believe more scrambling QBs are getting better at accuracy and consistency, but the fact that when they do scramble, they are putting themselves in more of harms way if they do not slide.
I think a scrambling QB benefits the team the most when the team has a weak O-line or can allow a team to get away with having a weak O-line.
Thoughts?