Thread: Rams owner buys 60 acres in LA

Originally Posted by dbfan2007

I'm still surprised by SLC's low population.

Forgot to post the link for the metro populations before you posted your response.

http://www.iweblists.com/us/populati...alAreaPop.html

Originally Posted by ShaneFalco

yea but there is interest from a loyal fan base there. SLC is trying to get a NFL team for a while, along with Sacramento. I forget which other US city was trying to get one...Maybe Las vegas...

I suspect that SLC won't have a chance to get a team until the NFL expands to at least 40+ teams.

Originally Posted by ShaneFalco

id rather live in STL 100x over living in LA.

Said nobody ever

They should try putting a team in Oakland.

Originally Posted by MasterShake

Yeah but the host cities seem to be the same 5 cities in a cycle. I know it would never happen, but I always had the thought of a truly "neutral" stadium somewhere like L.A. or even Vegas. Las Vegas would be crazy not to want something like that there!

The Pro Bowl in Las Vegas would not be a bad idea. Nobody gives a shit who wins (especially the players) so there would be no gambling interest involved. Plenty of attractions in the desert. Might be a tad chilly in late January but certainly worth exploring.

It sounds a bit like those "Nick Saban is buying a home in Austin" stories.

Originally Posted by OrangeHoof

It sounds a bit like those "Nick Saban is buying a home in Austin" stories.

Did he actually buy a house in Austin?

I can't wait for a team to finally go there just so owners can't keep threatening to go there every time they get a bug up their ass.

Improve your product on the field, douchebag, and then you can complain if the stadium isn't full or you're not making the coin you want. ********.