Thread: Which is the worse HC job of 2013

Cleveland Browns: Looking for their 5th coach in 7 years.

Washington Redskins: Has a QB that has bough into his press clipping & will expect you to bow to his greatness.

No place to vote for the Texans or Falcons? No Raiders? No Buccaneers?

Originally Posted by OrangeHoof

No place to vote for the Texans or Falcons? No Raiders? No Buccaneers?

Pretty sure he is only talking about open jobs. Atlanta and Oakland didn't even fire their coaches, and the other two you listed have been filled.

Tough choice but i voted the Browns just because the team is very uninteresting and its hard to draw high profile players there.

Cleveland sucks.

If the stories about RGIII are true + Dan Snyder I vote Washington most toxic

Originally Posted by BroncoWave

Pretty sure he is only talking about open jobs. Atlanta and Oakland didn't even fire their coaches, and the other two you listed have been filled.

Oh, sorry. Well, if that's the case, why isn't Detwat a choice?

Originally Posted by OrangeHoof

Oh, sorry. Well, if that's the case, why isn't Detwat a choice?

"Other".

I would vote for Cleveland. In Washington, you at least have a decent young back up QB and if RGIII ends up being the dick he is currently portrayed to be, you can at least go with Cousins if need be. In Cleveland...you have nothing at QB other than whatever guy they draft this year. Plus...it's Cleveland.

Browns have a solid defense, a star receiver, and a decent oline. All they need is a RB and a QB. They have enough draft picks to get everything that they need.

It's better than the Redskins who have not many picks, a questionable QB, a terrible defense, a bad oline, a name controversy that won't go away, and Jerry Jones Jr as owner.

Cleveland is easily the better coaching situation. Until Josh McDaniels gets hired and screws it all up.

Originally Posted by aberdien

Browns have a solid defense, a star receiver, and a decent oline. All they need is a RB and a QB. They have enough draft picks to get everything that they need.

It's better than the Redskins who have not many picks, a questionable QB, a terrible defense, a bad oline, a name controversy that won't go away, and Jerry Jones Jr as owner.

Cleveland is easily the better coaching situation. Until Josh McDaniels gets hired and screws it all up.

The Browns have needed a quarterback for a long time.

Maybe Washington. RGIII is a very questionable QB and the owner has an ego the size of Africa. No draft picks in the 1st sucks and not too sure that they have cap room.

Cleveland of course would suck too but at least there wont be as much expected upfront. The new coach should at least have a few years to get things going. They do have a decent defense and a high 1st round to work with. This team has been terrible for decades....their name sucks, their uniforms suck....the town sucks.......the weather sucks.....yeah not appealing at all.

The Browns were named after poop.

What if Cleveland offered their 1st for Os???


Look, most all of the other QBs in Os class have really panned out. Wilson, Luck, RGIII (when healthy), Foles....even Cousins looks solid. So if the QB pool isnt that appealing I wonder if they would call us or Washington. I think Washington would let Cousins go for a high 2nd.

Originally Posted by DenBronx

What if Cleveland offered their 1st for Os???


Look, most all of the other QBs in Os class have really panned out. Wilson, Luck, RGIII (when healthy), Foles....even Cousins looks solid. So if the QB pool isnt that appealing I wonder if they would call us or Washington. I think Washington would let Cousins go for a high 2nd.

Brock Osweiler?? I don't see anyone offering up a 1st round pick for him.