Thread: Nick Foles

If we can get him cheap for the future would you take Nick Foles?

Of course. You trade anything and everything. That's Nick ******* Foles.

Have you seen that hair? John Elway pt 2 I tell you what.

I would feel better with Foles on this squad than Barkley or any other QB in this draft.

Mays for Foles.

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

Mays for Foles.

I support this message.

Originally Posted by Northman

I would feel better with Foles on this squad than Barkley or any other QB in this draft.

I'm glad the Broncos have Osweiler now, but I was pulling for Foles in that draft . . .
.

I hope he goes to Jacksonville, he would beat out Gabbert in camp, at least their draft would make sense..........give those poor ******** some hope.

If the Eagles cut him, then I'd consider signing him as an FA for the right price & assign the guy we just drafted to the practice squad. As far as trading for a 3rd string QB, that’s not going to happen.

As far as “we already know that Brock Osweiler is a bust.” That’s right, if a QB that was drafted in the 2nd round can’t win the starting job during his rookie season, then he’s a bust. Just like Aaron Rodgers, who was drafted in the 1st round, didn’t win the starting job until his 4th season. Rodgers certainly has to be considered an epic bust by the standards that some people on this site have set for QBs.

Of course there are those, like myself, who realized that Favre was handed the starting job all of those years before Rodgers even reported to camp. For all of those who whine about how Tebow hasn’t been given a fair chance, Rodgers wasn’t given any chance with the Packers those 1st 3 seasons with Favre still there. Likewise, Osweiler won’t be given any chance to compete for the Broncos’ starting QB job until Manning retires (unless his skills go total goes into the tank). Therefore, we don’t know anything about Osweiler potential as our QB of the future.