I’m going to dig into some of the research and studies he touches on in the book. It’s interesting because the main thing that the experiences have in common is that they remove the ego and the id and force you to literally see yourself in a new way. I guess it’s similar to how sometimes dreams are a way we deal with stuff we can’t process consciously.
Like, when you eat a mushroom and talk with satan and Jesus with a 3rd person view of yourself while floating in the Pillars of Creation where you can “see” math, you are going to learn some real shit about yourself.
I really just love the author though--her voice.
Originally Posted by Sting
Finally got this one finished. If you like pop culture and music you'll like it. Light and fun reading. Here's a list of the chapters. I've bolded the ones I was particularly interested in:
Oasis vs Blur
Nirvana vs Pearl Jam
Prince vs Michael Jackson
White Stripes vs Black Keys
Taylor Swift vs Kanye West
Beatles vs Stones
Eric Clapton vs Jimi Hendrix
Sinead O'Connor vs Miley Cyrus
Roger Waters vs the Rest of Pink Floyd
Smashing Pumpkins vs Pavement
Madonna vs Cyndi Lauper and Britney Spears vs Christina Aguilera
Neil Young vs Lynyrd Skynyrd
Biggie vs Tupac
Toby Keith vs the Dixie Chicks
"I'm just more attracted to the Stones. The Beatles are the person you want to marry, and the Stones are the person you want to ****. If I could marry a band, I would be a Beatles person. But our society has not yet recognized person-rock band marriage rights. I guess you can't have sex with a band, either, but 'Sticky Fingers' is the closest that rock music gets to sex, so I'm a Stones guy."
"Your taste in music isn't really all that important when it comes to defining who you are as a person. It's not unimportant, particularly if the music you love forms a crucial part of how you view yourself. And it's certainly a fun topic to think and argue about. But if studying these rivalries teaches us anything, it's that what matters and what we believe matters in life often don't line up. In fact, our stupid beliefs can be the very thing that keeps us from realizing what's really real, which is that people are generally more similar than dissimilar and that we all want basically the same thing, which is for other people to like (or at least understand) us."
Radical Candor by Kim Scott. Leadership books make me roll my eyes sometimes. There are some good lessons to be had but they try to present their books as the only way to lead at times.
There are certainly guidelines, but not so many rules.
A lot of it, for me, is more about framing my leadership experience in a civilian or corporate context.
This book is good so far, I'm enjoying it, but it comes down to honesty and trust more than anything.
I'm mostly learning the lingo and language buzzwords from this one so I can speak to it with a boss I know loves the book. I don't see any negative leadership lessons in here so that's a start as it seems so many of these books lose me two chapters in to what I feel is just bad leadership advice.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)