Originally Posted by
Northman
Not from what i remember of the hit. Its the same exact circumstance that John Lynch got when he nailed the chiefs player some time back. Doesnt mean i like the rules but they are in place and the hit that Moore put on the guy was late (not too mention helmet to helmet). You can argue all day long about the semantics of one guy lowering his head to brace for a hit but it changes nothing. Ive been saying that very same thing for the last 3 years and now all of a sudden people want to use that line as an excuse? Again, bitch, cry, whine whatever about the rule but thats how they are written at this time but judging from what i saw of that hit it was a good call. I know this because i was extremely pissed that he didnt back off when it was a third and long and immediately gave them a first down.
Way, way off, North. I ran, reran, and ran again the replay. There was no way
Moore could have avoided the hit, and no way he could have avoided the
helmet-to-helmet. The receiver lowered his helmet just before contact. To
back off, Moore would have had to stop in mid-air. No one has done that
since Superman died . . .
.
Though He slay me, I will trust in Him . . . (Job 13:15)