You might have noticed that Adam Weber looked the best of the three backup QBs and he didn't even make the roster.
Why is that? Answer: Because they're not looking at putting in a rookie as Peyton Manning's replacement. They want a veteran. Hence Haney. Period.
If Osweiler had played like Andrew Luck could he have beaten out Hanie? Maybe. We don't really know the answer to that. Lots of talk about how the Broncos were looking to go with only 2 QBs and were giving Osweiler the chance to prove he's ready, blah, blah, blah.
But, none of that speculation came from Dove Valley. All of it came from sports talk show hosts making assumptions.
In truth, Fox has always HATED starting rookies. He wasn't going to start his 1st pick, Derek Wolfe despite how good he looked in the pre-season until Jason Hunter went down for the season.
And if Manning were hurt and was going to miss a couple of games? Does Fox really want to start a rookie? NO! Of course, if Manning were lost for the season at any point there would be no real purpose in starting Hanie. Hanie is never going to lead the Broncos on a playoff run.
In that case it's Osweiler time. Might as well get him some experience.
But, it's idiotic to assume that because 21 year old Brock Osweiler didn't beat out the veteran Hanie to become the backup to Manning, that he's a bust.
A big part of the reason Denver drafted him is that he's NOT ready. They didn't WANT a 27 year old QB like Russell Wilson who might be ready this year or next.
They WANT a raw rookie with some basic skills whom they can mold into a starting QB the way Green Bay did with Aaron Rogers.
Is Osweiler ever going to become Aaron Rogers? Who knows? He certainly is nothing like him now. But, he's also going to be content to sit on the bench for 3 or 4 years and work on his development because by the time Manning retires he'll only be 24 or 25 years old. (Weber is 27 now and Brandon Weeden whom the Broncos liked and might have tried to draft if he were available and if Manning had chosen another team, is 29).