Won't matter because Peyton will start all 16 gamesOriginally Posted by Chef Zambini
Won't matter because Peyton will start all 16 gamesOriginally Posted by Chef Zambini
"Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold
should we go there again?
therer are DOZENS of examples of back-up QBs thaT DID NOT start the season, but came in, not only to win games, but to lead their teams to the play-offs ! some even won the superbowl !
this is indisputable reality! people can come here and post stipulations and exxagerations and modifications , and lose their football compass in the fracus, but the REALITY remains that many of the NFL back-up QBs have been very successful!
Last edited by GEM; 06-18-2012 at 10:25 AM. Reason: name calling removed
CAN WE PLEASE JUST SKIP ALL THE NONESENSE AND JUST TALK FOOTBALL?
I'm talking regular season. Not gonna get ahead of myself too muchOriginally Posted by Chef Zambini
"Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold
You have to remember Peyton is adapting to the Broncos Offense, the terminology is the same and what they do before Tebow Came is the same, with new wrinkles that Peyton likes to run. So a new guy having to learn terminology, routes, and etc. that is where the set back is.
.
Name these dozen examples where a strictly backup QB came in and played an important role in helping his team win the SuperBowl, and if you are going to use guys like Tom Brady and Kurt Warner, I'll ask you to name the next young future HoF QB currently in the league that would have been a legitimate option to backup Peyton Manning.
The Manning offense in Indy kept the ball out of Manning's hand early enough where he was rarely hit. I don't know if the Broncos will be running Manning's offense or Manning is going to run McCoy's offense but with garbage backing him up, I surely hope they are running Manning's offense because it features a lot of play action and timing throws designed to get the ball out of Manning's hand before the rush has a chance to get there.
I miss the old Mile High Stadium.
ben rothlesburger
brette favre
steve young
bubbie brister
a half dozen raiders, one of which won the superbowl
vince young
4 guys named matt
kevin kolb
jeff hoestetler
tim tebow, he won 6 in a row.
do i have to go on?
DOZENS of back-up QBs have come in and been successful, but people WANT TO SAY IT NEVER HAPPENED? GO AHEAD ******** DENY IT !
throw in some stipulations just like the first person !
back up QBs win games ! TEAMS dont pack it in when the starter goes down !
Last edited by GEM; 06-18-2012 at 10:24 AM.
CAN WE PLEASE JUST SKIP ALL THE NONESENSE AND JUST TALK FOOTBALL?
You're getting a little ahead of yourself with the name calling, for starters.Originally Posted by Chef Zambini
Brister was a career backup who had a couple good games. Not successful.
Vince Young was a first round draft pick and drafted to start. Hasn't done shit since he left TN, and likely won't. So scratch him off.
Four guys named Matt?
Since the word "success" is highly subjective, how I would categorize "successful" backup QBs is by comparing them all to Steve Young or Kurt Warner. Compared to them, pretty much the entirety of your list can be voided.
"Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold
I would add Jeff Garcia to the list of successful backup QBs also
"Milk is for babies. When you grow up, you have to drink beer" -Arnold
brister was UNDEFEATED as a bronco back-up ! george blanda?
hello, this dude invented the 2 minute drill !
but nobody wants zam to be right so now they will once again start with stoopid shit to disallow anyone that fails to meet their ever evolving, revised, criteria of what quyalifies as a back-up, even though now qualification was laid out to start 1 agaim]n i say ******** !
Last edited by GEM; 06-18-2012 at 10:23 AM. Reason: Unnecessary reference deleted
CAN WE PLEASE JUST SKIP ALL THE NONESENSE AND JUST TALK FOOTBALL?
OK, Chef. Tell me how many career NFL wins the current Bronco backups have?
Hanie? ZERO
Weber? ZERO
Osweller? ZERO
So, regardless what you say, the Broncos don't have a backup quarterback who has won an NFL game as a backup or a starter. Therefore, it's STOOOOOOOOPID to argue that the Broncos are adequately equipped to win should Manning go down. In fact, I'll bet that after this season, the Bronco QBs named above will STILL not have won a game in their careers.
I miss the old Mile High Stadium.
and thats why I suggested that if it did happen, JE would look to sign a free agent vet! and you are probably one of the people that ripped me for that too !
and thanks for reducing my list of choices to just 3 ! just like I said all the people would do to try and make their paythetic arguements ! typical !
Last edited by GEM; 06-18-2012 at 10:22 AM. Reason: Personal attacks deleted
CAN WE PLEASE JUST SKIP ALL THE NONESENSE AND JUST TALK FOOTBALL?
this is the original question that I tried to answewr. notice how the choices go from ANY to just 3?
thanks to all of you for supporting my original point on this subject that the broncos have FAILED to supply this team with an adequate back-up QB ! and now you can argue against yourselves to rebell against that statement !
CAN WE PLEASE JUST SKIP ALL THE NONESENSE AND JUST TALK FOOTBALL?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)