Page 2 of 105 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 12 52 102 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 1570

Thread: Broncos 2012 Draft Day Thread: 04/26/12 - 04/28/12

  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Adopted Bronco:
    Ray Finkel
    Posts
    86,709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by turftoad View Post
    I think they had to do it Mo. To many teams were looking to trade up with the Vikes for Richardson. They wanted him and did what they had to do to firm it up.
    Unfortuanely, i think they sacrificed a lot of other needs too in the process. They got a lot of problems there still.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Adopted Bronco:
    Pat Bowlen
    Posts
    97,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northman View Post
    Unfortuanely, i think they sacrificed a lot of other needs too in the process. They got a lot of problems there still.
    Apparently, they still have 10 picks, and they still have the 22. Maybe they weren't enamored with anyone there and will look to acquire some more picks that way. When you have three picks in top 40 you can make some moves and still get three or four starters out of the deal.
    *The statements above are my opinions, unless they are links, because then they are links, which wouldn't make them my opinions, and I suppose stats aren't necessarily opinion, but they are certainly presented to support an opinion. Proceed accordingly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buff View Post
    What is this, amateur hour? It's TNF against the Jets and you didn't think you'd need extra booze?

  3. The Following 2 Users High Fived MOtorboat For This Post:


  4. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MOtorboat View Post
    So, we know the first three picks.

    Odds that it still takes nearly 30 minutes to get to the fourth pick once the draft starts...
    Well yeah...they gotta hold up a jersey n take pictures with Goodell.
    Growing up I always thought that that would be the most awesome thing ever...now I'm a father, so now I'd much rather see one/both of my sons do it far more than I ever wanted it for me.

  5. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    iowa
    Posts
    359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northman View Post
    Unfortuanely, i think they sacrificed a lot of other needs too in the process. They got a lot of problems there still.
    IF Doug Martin is still there @ 22 then I don't like this trade.
    #1 WR and #2 RB both drafted by the same team? That would be a great day!

    -of course, he may not be there...

  6. #20
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Adopted Bronco:
    Ray Finkel
    Posts
    86,709

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MOtorboat View Post
    Apparently, they still have 10 picks, and they still have the 22. Maybe they weren't enamored with anyone there and will look to acquire some more picks that way. When you have three picks in top 40 you can make some moves and still get three or four starters out of the deal.
    10? Really? Dang. I stand corrected. I didnt think they had that many.

  7. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Little Elm, TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    #58
    Posts
    26,171

    Default

    They could have gone with Blackmon at 4 and Martin at 22.

  8. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Adopted Bronco:
    Pat Bowlen
    Posts
    97,306

    Default

    Quick Top 10 prediction:
    1. Indy - Luck
    2. Wash - RGIII
    3. Cleve - Richardson
    4. Minn - Kalil
    5. Tampa - Claiborne
    6. STL - Blackmon
    7. Dallas (trade) - Barron
    8. Miami - Tannehill
    9. Carolina - Ingram
    10. Bills - Kuechly
    *The statements above are my opinions, unless they are links, because then they are links, which wouldn't make them my opinions, and I suppose stats aren't necessarily opinion, but they are certainly presented to support an opinion. Proceed accordingly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buff View Post
    What is this, amateur hour? It's TNF against the Jets and you didn't think you'd need extra booze?

  9. The Following 2 Users High Fived MOtorboat For This Post:


  10. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    67,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northman

    10? Really? Dang. I stand corrected. I didnt think they had that many.
    Yea, they had 13. one of the ESPN guys said that the Browns know that 13 draft choices weren't going to make roster, so used the ammo to be sure to get their guy. They may trade again to get a third first round pick.

    Sent from my Android Xoom using Forum Runner

  11. The Following User High Fived Tned For This Post:


  12. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Adopted Bronco:
    Pat Bowlen
    Posts
    97,306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tned View Post
    Yea, they had 13. one of the ESPN guys said that the Browns know that 13 draft choices weren't going to make roster, so used the ammo to be sure to get their guy. They may trade again to get a third first round pick.

    Sent from my Android Xoom using Forum Runner
    Lammey just tweeted that they are going to try to come back up for an OT and three picks tonight.
    *The statements above are my opinions, unless they are links, because then they are links, which wouldn't make them my opinions, and I suppose stats aren't necessarily opinion, but they are certainly presented to support an opinion. Proceed accordingly.

    Quote Originally Posted by Buff View Post
    What is this, amateur hour? It's TNF against the Jets and you didn't think you'd need extra booze?

  13. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    N. Colorado
    Adopted Bronco:
    Mark 'Dirty' Sanchez
    Posts
    9,307

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MOtorboat View Post
    Lammey just tweeted that they are going to try to come back up for an OT and three picks tonight.
    Actually there is some chatter that Cleveland might be looking to trade up with Denver for Weeden, but I suppose they could be wrong and it's for an offensive tackle, especially with Glenn, Martin and maybe Adams being possibly available in that area.

  14. The Following User High Fived Lancane For This Post:


  15. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Denver
    Adopted Bronco:
    Dangerous Freedom Lock
    Posts
    25,132

    Default

    so exciting!

  16. #27
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Adopted Bronco:
    Ray Finkel
    Posts
    86,709

    Default

    Lets get this party started.

  17. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northman View Post
    Lets get this party started.
    I love this day!
    Bill Williamson:

    "The Broncos went from one of the more attractive organizations in the NFL to one in total disarray. McDaniels will go down as one of the most reviled figures in Denver sports history".

  18. The Following 2 Users High Fived turftoad For This Post:


  19. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,135

    Default

    Matt Kennedy Gould goes #1 to the Colts.

  20. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Edmonton, Canada
    Posts
    5,578

    Default

    I haven't followed an NFL draft this little in a long time. No idea whatsoever who we're gonna pick and it really doesn't matter to me. Nothing really intrigues me unless we trade up or trade down.
    Go Broncos!

Go
Shop AFC Champions and Super Bowl gear at the official online Pro Shop of the Denver Broncos!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group