Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Mock trade scenario: denver trades 25th pick to stl rams for their 2 2nd rounders!!

  1. #1

    Default Mock trade scenario: denver trades 25th pick to stl rams for their 2 2nd rounders!!

    Denver selects. Poe, dt . Hightower, lb. Miller, RB.

    That's a damn good second rd.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    If you think Poe is going to still be there in the second and if you think a low 1st is going to get two seconds, I'm guessing this is your first NFL draft.
    I miss the old Mile High Stadium.

  3. The Following 2 Users High Fived OrangeHoof For This Post:


  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Adopted Bronco:
    Von "the Animal" Miller
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    Hmmm, the Rams have the 33rd and 39th picks in the second round. Trading those two picks for the Broncos 25th pick in the first round is way overpayment for the Rams. How about the Broncos trade the #25 overall pick for the Rams 33rd pick/2nd round and 65th pick/3rd round? This is closer to fitting with the draft value chart (see attached) but still has a gap favorable to the Broncos.

    http://www.thehogs.net/football101/d...lue-chart.html
    Last edited by LTC Pain; 04-17-2012 at 12:05 PM.

  5. The Following User High Fived LTC Pain For This Post:


  6. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Yes, a low first for a 2nd and 3rd is more plausible.

    That would give us:

    2a. 33rd overall (from STL)
    2b. 57th overall
    3a. 65th overall (from STL)
    3b. 87th overall
    4a. 108th overall (from NYJ)
    4b. 120th overall
    5. 137th overall (from STL)
    6. 188th overall (from NYJ)

    Interesting that we would be quiet in the early and late parts of the draft but active in the middle rounds. Not necessarily a bad strategy in a year where there is not a lot of great talent in the first and much of the value could be found in the middle rounds.

    I could see a DT and RB in the second, other needs in the third and fourth with the last two picks being projects.
    I miss the old Mile High Stadium.

  7. The Following 2 Users High Fived OrangeHoof For This Post:


  8. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Highlands Ranch
    Adopted Bronco:
    Greg Kragen
    Posts
    5,933

    Default

    Poe is French Polynesian for BUST.
    I am a broncos fan. I believe in mile high magic. I bleed orange and blue. I celebrate the orange crush, the drive and the Mile High Salute. I create the Thunder. I Share the common dream and will forever be a proud citizen of Bronco Country!

  9. #6

    Default

    Did this actually happen or is it a mock/wish? Many people thought this actually happened based on thread title.

  10. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    4,035

    Default

    Tned, there's no corresponding evidence of fact and the post appears to be in "Draft and Free Agency" (I don't know if it was moved to there). More than one of us has chimed in that such a trade is unrealistic since the Rams would be giving up a lot just to move up eight spots.
    I miss the old Mile High Stadium.

  11. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Adopted Bronco:
    Von "the Animal" Miller
    Posts
    1,311

    Default

    Don't know if the thread originator changed the title but it is "Mock Trade Scenario" now

  12. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Riviera Maya
    Adopted Bronco:
    shank
    Posts
    7,140

    Default

    As it should be. thanks to whomever fixed it. Broncs don't be a doosh.

  13. The Following User High Fived Slick For This Post:


  14. #10

    Default

    My bad. Sorry to get everyone's hopes up lol

  15. The Following User High Fived broncs9899 For This Post:


  16. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Corn
    Adopted Bronco:
    Charles Dimry
    Posts
    43,266
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    What player is St. Louis moving up to get?
    Quote Originally Posted by King87 View Post
    I awesome that was him from your adopted Bronco.
    Quote Originally Posted by slim View Post
    It's not my fault. I am dumb.
    I wish Greg Jennings was in my lap.

  17. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Elpaso TX
    Adopted Bronco:
    Josh McDaniels Sucks
    Posts
    30,590

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by broncs9899 View Post
    My bad. Sorry to get everyone's hopes up lol
    I was happy as a mf'er at first. I still would like them to trade it for a future first though...
    Thanks MO for the wicked Sig.

  18. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MOtorboat View Post
    What player is St. Louis moving up to get?
    Notice that this idea doesn't even bother to mention that key point? Why do you think that the Rams won't just sit there and take 2 2nd round players? Who's so great at #25 that they just must have him.

    It's not even worth evaluating the trade points value for each team to see if it's realistic when there's not even a plausible reason why the Rams would want to do this in the first place! In short the entire thread is utterly ridiculous.

  19. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    In the wake of Hurricane Josh.......
    Adopted Bronco:
    John F'n Elway
    Posts
    5,477

    Default

    Doug Martin? Maybe the Rams wanna get in front of the Giants to get the 2nd best RB in the draft. That's as plausible as the Rams taking one pick to two comparable picks.......
    2- Damontre Moore DE
    2- Christine Michael RB
    3- Da'Rick Rogers WR
    4- Quanteris Smith DE
    4- Xavier Nixon LG
    5- Nicholas Williams DT
    7- Rogers Gaines OT

    Cfa- Latavius Murray RB
    Cfa- Nathan Stanley QB
    Cfa- Marcus Cooper CB
    Cfa- Ray Polk SS
    Cfa- Brice Butler WR/CB

    I might even sub Michael Buchanon for Da'Rick Rogers and draft 3 DE's. Denver has exactly zero RDE's atm, Q Smith might have to start season on the Pup and Ayers is going into contract season.

Go

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
status.broncosforums.com - BroncosForums status updates
dedicated servers
Partner with the USA Today Sports Media Group