Thread: Are Stafford and Sanchez Good Value At 12 or 18

People read way too much into teams being or not being represented at Pro Day's. A lot of teams just don't go because it costs a shit ton of money.

Originally Posted by claymore

I dont have an argument for that other than Hope, Ortons college career, and Hope.

'Hope' ---- Glorious...

Please not another overhyped USC QB. That's all I ask of McDaniels but some scouts think otherwise. Like I said in another thread NFL QBs from Purdue seems to be more successful than NFL QBs from USC.

Originally Posted by Cicero

People read way too much into teams being or not being represented at Pro Day's. A lot of teams just don't go because it costs a shit ton of money.

Denver and KC were the only ones that didnt go. USC pro days are like seminars in Vegas. You go regardless of what its for.

Claymore, go get my ice cream.

I wouldn't be upset if we went Sanchez at #12, BUT we have 2 #1s next year as a safety net in case Orton doesn't perform well.

I hope we go Tyson Jackson at 12 and Rey falls to 18. That would be ideal, IMO.

Screw Sanchez. I really don't think they would take him, even if he falls to 12.

Originally Posted by SmilinAssasSin27

I wouldn't be upset if we went Sanchez at #12, BUT we have 2 #1s next year as a safety net in case Orton doesn't perform well.

That's the idea! What makes Stafford/Sanchez a must-have (not saying he's thinking this)that McDaniels doesn't want to give Orton a shot knowing he has 2 first rounders next year with a QB class just as good as this years????

stafford is good value at 12 and 18.....

sanchez in my opinion isnt even good value in the late 20's.

the guy has 1 year of college ball under his belt, despite all these great workouts and wowing of scouts the guy will choke in the pros, just like all the other 1 year college starting qb's did before him.....

i'd take Sanchez before I'd take Stafford, and if Sanchez is available, then I think we have to take him and see what happens.

Originally Posted by Northman

Honestly, i would rather draft a RB if we did go offense in the first round. If not, go defense with both.

^^ this ^^


i took the "McDaniels should get bent if drafts either one of them" option. . . i'd like to see what neck beard can do behind a much better pass-blocking O-line and with a much better group of receivers before we burn a high pick on a totally green QB. . . cripes, can't we just fix the _efense already? honestly, who thinks shenanigans couldn't have polished this offense into a lethal machine given another year or two. . . if doogie can't fix the D, this whole thing has just been a debacle. . .


i like knowshon or tyson jackson, maaaybe malcolm jenkins at 12 if raji and brown are gone. . . . at 18 i'd obviously take any of those guys if they're still there, and i'd also look at larry english, clay matthews, or possibly clint sintim. . . and i wouldn't mind maualuga at 18 either, although i really think OLB is a more immediate need. . .

Originally Posted by Elevation inc

stafford is good value at 12 and 18.....

sanchez in my opinion isnt even good value in the late 20's.

the guy has 1 year of college ball under his belt, despite all these great workouts and wowing of scouts the guy will choke in the pros, just like all the other 1 year college starting qb's did before him.....

is that why you dont like him? because he has only 1 year of experience?

If the only weakness Sanchez has is "lack of experience" than Ill be more than happy to take him at 12.

Originally Posted by EMB6903

is that why you dont like him? because he has only 1 year of experience?

If the only weakness Sanchez has is "lack of experience" than Ill be more than happy to take him at 12.

really perhaps you should look at the history of college Qb's with little expirience when they declare and the sucess they have in the pros, i can tell you it will probally change your mind.

I think if we trade a qb for first round picks only to turn around and use a first on a QB that is simply a waste of what we got in the trade.

That is almost just turning around and trading your QB for a rookie QB, what is the point.

If we don't use all those picks we got, or atleast all the firsts on defensive players I personally think it will be one of the most moronic deals we have ever done.

we are going to draft a rb and a de/olb in the first. Unless raji falls, which he might. I thought jax would take raji- they still might, but they also imo are going to consider wells/moreno (moreson Moreno) and sanchez. But Raji, moreno, shanchez imo would be their top 3.


They have similiar needs to us.