Thread: Tim Tebow trade rumors swirl around Denver, NFL

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

Don't worry. Denver will just sign a big name free agent this year to replace him.

We already did Mo. Jason Hill!!
Thats about as big of a name thats gonna want to be an offense that throws the ball 10 times a game.

Originally Posted by MOtorboat

Don't worry. Denver will just sign a big name free agent this year to replace him.

Exactly. After all, they did sign none other than Jerry Rice, didn't they?

-----

Originally Posted by turftoad

We already did Mo. Jason Hill!!
Thats about as big of a name thats gonna want to be an offense that throws the ball 10 times a game.

Might increase the number of recruits among cheerleaders, though.

That's about they only way they can expect a pass from Tebow . . .

-----

Originally Posted by broncobryce

You're right, the whole thing was just pure luck. Sorry it just sounds like you are making excuse after excuse.

I won't make excuses for Tebow's bad play at times, so I don't accept writing off his excellent play in crucial spots as luck.

But you can do whatever you want. Just be careful because we might be watching this guy QB our team for the next 10 years.

Don't mistake my intent Bryce, I will not discount 'luck' from some of those victories, because to do so would be pure ignorance. And I also realize that a good portion of the equation in some of those wins heralded from Tebow's uncanny intangibles. I'm not making excuses, I have no reason to do so in such an argument, as you well know.

Tebow was as much a part of the team having to come from behind as he was for rallying the offense in order to pull off the comeback. It wouldn't have been necessary if he had the knowledge and mechanics to play the position as required at this level and could do so for more then one or two quarters. The Pittsburgh game was the only game this past season where it looked as if he was actually playing all four quarters, so what's the excuse the other times? What's the excuse for him to not even be able to play a decent game against mediocre defenses? Discount the fact that he sucked more often then not and couldn't barely pass the football against horrific defenses and then play only one solid game, one in which he actually looked like a quarterback. Sorry, I'm more realistic then that.

Originally Posted by Nomad

I wonder what the cat is thinking.

the shit I put up with all for some lousy friskies !

folks,
\ can we please get past the orton VS tebow crap/
orton is gone, its over and he aint coming back.
its like wasting our time harping over cutler and plummer.
can we please move on?
orton has NOTHING to do with tebow, the broncos, or the entire state of colorado.
save it for the weeks we play the cheifs, ok ?

Originally Posted by Chef Zambini

folks,
\ can we please get past the orton VS tebow crap/
orton is gone, its over and he aint coming back.
its like wasting our time harping over cutler and plummer.
can we please move on?
orton has NOTHING to do with tebow, the broncos, or the entire state of colorado.
save it for the weeks we play the cheifs, ok ?

Or.... whoever he ends up playing for.

Originally Posted by turftoad

Or.... whoever he ends up playing for.

I hope it's somewhere else outside of the AFCW. I don't want to see him twice a
year. There's a long history of ex-Broncos coming back and haunting the Broncos . . .

-----

Yes, the idea of facing the mighty Kyle Orton twice a season is terrifying...

Originally Posted by BroncoStud

Yes, the idea of facing the mighty Kyle Orton twice a season is terrifying...

While I do have a tendency to agree with you about Orton. You do realize that Denver has never won a game against a team in which he is the starting quarterback, right?

It is pretty pathetic that the Broncos couldn't muster more than 1 TD to beat the Orton-led Chiefs this year... He's just so pathetic to watch play... I liken it to a cow stuck in barbed wire.

Originally Posted by Npba900

As we speak! There isn't 31 NFL teams that would want "Project Tebow" as its future starting/long term QB. However, a team that has a Think-Outside-The Box" offensive guru would be totally intrigued with trading for Tebow to bring him in as Tight End.

Don't ever change np, no matter what anyone says. Your constant "TT as a TE" shtick will catch on like "who's on first" one day!

Originally Posted by topscribe

...while I believe TT15's post is utter nonsense...

I'll eat my words for all the doubters and EFX "believers" when Elway comes out and says...
"Tebow. Is. Our. Starting. QB. Period. Preseason. Regular season. Period."

Until that happens, I say that EFX (at least E) wanted to quiet the hysteria and let Tebow prove that he was a bust. There was no confidence by the "E"(xecutives) that Tebow could play in the league. He would fail, we would put in Qwinn near the end to prove that he would fail also, and then, we would go on to draft Luck. Problem solved. Well, script flipped, "E" had to back off and eat his words, and relegate to hedging his bets by making Tebow the starting QB heading into training camp. Can't even come out and give Tebow a full season following a full offseason to prove himself. Nope. He's only got training camp. Please...

Originally Posted by Shazam!

This is complete fabricated bull!@#$.

NO WAY does Denver management trade it's starting QB twice in 5 years.

...and Miller too?? Riiiiiight.

They benched and released their starting QB last year, why the F' wouldn't they trade one this year?.......

Originally Posted by Dzone

That would be the absolute most stupid move this franchise could ever possibly make.The empty seats at Mile High would outnumber the people in the stadium. We would be 2-14 and watching Tebow lead some other team to the super bowl. Talk about feeling crappy.

This is a slow time of year for sportswriters, so they have to say something idiotic in order to garner some attention for themselves

The Broncos have been selling out Mile High for decades, l think you overestimate the drawing power of high school offenses.......